My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 01/08/2002
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2002
>
Minutes - Council - 01/08/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 11:15:02 AM
Creation date
5/6/2003 10:31:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
01/08/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Administrator Norman noted that there have been a couple of cages where park dedication <br />fees have been negotiated out, but typically the Park Department does receive money from TIF. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Hendriksen, seconded by Councilmember Kurak, to grant <br />preliminary plat approval of Sunfish Business Park contingent upon compliance with City staff <br />review letter dated November 30, 2001, and upon resolving the access issue with Anoka County <br />that the City agrees to. <br /> <br />Further discussion: Councilmember Zimmerman inquired if they should be making any decision <br />on park dedication. Councilmember Anderson replied that the issue is included in the staff <br />review letter and felt that it could be addressed as each lot is developed. Councilmember <br />Zimmennan inquired if the access on Lot 2, Block 2, along Sunfish Lake Boulevard was going to <br />be dedicated to the County. Community Development Director Frolik replied that if the access <br />abuts Sunfish Lake Boulevard it would be a standard requirement by Anoka County. <br />Councihnen~ber Hendriksen stated that those are the things that should be pointed out by staff <br />when negotiating the intersection with the County. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Councilmembers Hendriksen, Anderson, and Zimmerman. Voting <br />No: None. Absent: Mayor Gamec, and Councilmember Kurak. <br /> <br />Case #3: <br /> <br />Adopt Resolution Supporting the TH 10 Interregional Corridor Management <br />Plan <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman stated that the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) <br />began a TH 10 Interregional Corridor Management Plan for TH 10. The Plan is intended to <br />cover the TH 10 from 1-35W on the east side of TH 24 in Clear Lake on the west, and involves <br />participation with MnDOT District 3 and the Metro Division. The purpose of the Plan has been <br />to develop a common vision in management approach in order to preserve and improve TH 10's <br />ability to serve as an important statewide connection for Minnesota in the future. MnDOT has <br />utilized the services of the Howard R. Green Company to perform the study. The City Council <br />received a presentation by Howard R. Green Company during the Public Works Committee <br />meeting of November 20, 2001. The study showed two separate options for the City of Ramsey <br />for TH 10. The options included the possibility of an expressway that would eventually be <br />converted to a freeway or a freeway system. The freeway system could have three alignments. <br />The preferred alignment seemed to be the northernmost alignment that is immediately adjacent to <br />the BNSF Rail system. During the November 29, 2001, joint meeting of the Policy Advisory <br />Committee and Technical Advisory Committee of the TH 10 Interregional Corridor Study, <br />MnDOT officials recommended that each City along the corridor adopt resolutions in support of <br />the process. Subsequently, MnDOT staff met with City staff and framed a resolution in support <br />for the Management Plan that included support of a freeway system and included a preference for <br />the Northernmost alignment of a freeway system. The City Council considered a resolution <br />during their Council meeting of December 18, 2001, and directed staff to develop a resolution <br />that supported the fi'eeway without expressing a preference for a corridor alignment. That <br />change was made and presented to the Council for consideration. <br /> <br />City Council/January 8, 2002 <br /> Page 13 of 27 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.