Laserfiche WebLink
City Attorney Goodrich noted that all 13 amendments are being subject to change, but not being <br />adopted. There will be many amendments made to the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />Mayor Garnec returned. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen stated that there is a Comprehensive Plan amendment that will be <br />subject to a public hearing, he inquired if the land use map includes all 13 proposed changes <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich replied yes. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen stated that then a change has occurred to the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich replied that there has been no change made to the Comprehensive Plan <br />by the action taken on December 11, 2001. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen stated that there is a draft of a Comprehensive Plan amendment and <br />that amendment has changed as a result of the vote on December 11, 2001. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich replied that the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment has changed, <br />but it is only a proposal and can change again. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen inquired if the amendment could be voted on in its entirety. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich replied that that decision is up to the Council, but noted that it could be. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen stated that a Councilmember voted to add an amendment pertaining <br />to her property that included a land use so, in his opinion, Mr. LeFevere's opinion does not hold <br />up. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich replied that he did not agree. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen stated that if the City Attorney is stating that someone with a <br />significant financial interest could not vote on the Comprehensive Plan amendment then he <br />would not object. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich replied that the action taken on December 11 was to schedule a public <br />hearing rather than voting on something that would give someone substantial financial gain. He <br />has not given an opinion if any Councilmember would have a conflict of interest for voting on an <br />amendment. <br /> <br />Councihnember Kurak stated that the Council discussed each and every amendment on <br />December 11, and recommended that they be submitted to a public hearing, which is required by <br />State Statute. The purpose of the public hearing is to submit the information to the public and <br />receive public comment. Once that process has been completed then the amendments will come <br /> <br />City Council/January 8, 2002 <br /> Page 22 of 27 <br /> <br /> <br />