Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember Hendriksen inquired as to how many of the cities that staff contacted offer an <br />exception to the requirement. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik replied that none of the four cities that she spoke with <br />have any type of exception. <br /> <br />Councihnember Kurak noted that they are only talking about areas outside of the MUSA and <br />over ten acres in size. What they are trying to do by allowing the exception is allow farmers to <br />farm their land without encumbering the property with drainage and utility easements. She <br />stated that she personally knew of an instance where there have been drainage and utility <br />easements over wetland and the City has dug ponds. She felt that what was being proposed was <br />fair for residents in the City of Ramsey. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman replied that the entire parcel would not be placed under a drainage <br />and utility easement, only the portion the City would deem necessary. <br /> <br />City Engineer OIson explained that the proposed policy does not preclude the City from asking <br />for drainage and utility easements. If a property owner agrees to the drainage and utility <br />easements, it would save them the step of having to identify drainage patterns on the property. <br /> <br />Councihnember Hendriksen stated that it seemed as if other cities require the dedication of <br />wetland and yet the City of Ramsey would be taking the opposite approach. He felt the solution <br />might be to require that all wetlands be encumbered with drainage and utility easements unless <br />the property owner requests a waiver and proves that it is not needed. If they as a Council make <br />a conscious decision not to acquire the wetland, it should be done under a very careful process <br />with proof being presented why the easement is not necessary. <br /> <br />Councihnember Anderson questioned what the City Attorney's opinion was regarding the policy. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich felt that there were sufficient safe guards in the policy as proposed, but <br />noted that he did not see any problem with Councilmember Hendriksen's recommendation <br />either. <br /> <br />City Engineer Olson inquired if Councilmember Hendriksen was suggesting that the City require <br />the delineation of all wetlands, but give the property owner the opportunity to prove that the <br />drainage and utility easement is not necessary. <br /> <br />Councilmelnber Hendriksen replied yes. <br /> <br />City Engineer Olson explained that the policy as it was presented would require any plat within <br />the MUSA that included wetlands would automatically be encumbered by a drainage and utility <br />easement. What the policy would allow for is anything outside of the MUSA and over ten acres <br />the City Engineer would be able to make a determination as to whether the drainage and utility <br /> <br />City Council/January 22, 2002 <br /> Page 6 of 25 <br /> <br /> <br />