Laserfiche WebLink
comprehensive plan amendment. City Attorney Goodrich replied that there was nothing in the <br />City ordinance that would prevent the property owner from making another request. <br />Councihnember Hendriksen inquired, if there are any further applications, will the City charge <br />the appropriate fee. City Attorney Goodrich replied that that is the City's responsibility <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Hendriksen, Zimmerman, and <br />Anderson. Voting No: None. Abstained: CouncilmemberKurak. <br /> <br />Richard Krueger stated that Councilmember Hendriksen stated that there were no protections in <br />place for the neighbors to the north but at one time there was a 90-foot easement as well as <br />wetlands. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen replied that some of the residents would not want to see 15 units or <br />more per acre adjoining their property. If all of the residents are in favor then it is not an issue. <br />He stated that he did support a higher use for the property, but there are no protections in place <br />for the existing residents at this time. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec recessed the regular meeting of the City Council at 9:18 p.m. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec called the regular meeting of the City Council back to order at 9:24 p.m. <br /> <br />Kurak Property II (North and South of Sunwood Drive) <br /> <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon stated that the City received a request to change the land use from <br />Low Density Residential to a combination of Medium Density and Low Density Residential. <br />The Planning Commission recommended that the land use remain as Low Density Residential on <br />a 5-1-1 vote. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec stated that he felt a plan is very important for the development of the property. He <br />stated that it had been discussed that the property will probably be developed as a mixed <br />development, but it is very difficult to act on the property without seeing a proposed project. He <br />stated that he would like to see the residents work with the property owners and bring back a <br />recommendation to the City Council. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich noted that March 26, 2002, is the date the Council has to take action, if <br />the applicant wants to extend the time line he can do that, otherwise the Council will have to take <br />action before March 26, 2002. He stated that the Council could move to table action and direct <br />staff to draft findings of fact in the positive and negative. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec inquired if Ms. Horn would be willing to work with Mr. Kurak on developing a <br />plan for the site. <br /> <br />City Council/February 26, 2002 <br /> Page 20 of 35 <br /> <br /> <br />