Laserfiche WebLink
Co <br /> <br />period. When the Urban Service Area expansion in this sector was delineated in <br />the Development Framework, it was planned to be expanded by about one square mile <br />in the City of Andover and two square miles in the City of Ramsay. Metropolitan <br />Systems, especially for sewers and transportation, are being planned to accommodate <br />this Urban Service Area expansion during 1981-90. <br /> <br />The size of Ramsey's proposed Urban Service Area is not entirely consistent with <br />the Development Framework Urban Service Area, but this is not a major concern. <br />Ramsey's proposed 1990 Urban Service Area would provide about 4.4 square miles <br />of developable land. This figure was not provided in the plan amendment but is <br />based on Council staff calculations from maps included in the plan amendment. <br />It should also be noted that when ~hese calculations were made by staff, undevelop- <br />able lands such as wetlands were subtracted. Ramsey's proposed zoning, however, <br />might allow development in these wetland areas. This means that Rams~y's proposed <br />Urban Service Area is potentially larger than 4.4 square miles. Thus, Ramsey's <br />proposed Urban Service Area of 4.4 square miles would constitute an expansion of <br />the Metropolitan Urban Service Area in one single municipality that is greater <br />than the expansion required (3 square miles) in the entire North Minneapolis sector. <br /> <br />The apparent reason for Ramsay delineating a 4.4 square mile Urban Service Area <br />is that the City is anticipating a significantly larger 1990 population and number <br />of households than that forecasted by the Metropolitan Council. (Table 2) <br /> <br /> TABL~ 2 <br /> <br />Comparison of Metropolitan Council and Ramsay Forecasts <br /> <br />1976 Population (estimate) <br />1976-90 Population Growth <br /> <br />1990 Population <br /> <br />1976 Households (estimate) <br />1976 - 90 Household Growth <br /> <br />1990 Households <br /> <br />1970 Employment <br />1990 Employment <br /> <br />Metropolitan <br /> Council Ramsay <br /> <br /> 7,620 7,620 <br /> 1,380 10,500 <br /> <br /> 9,000 18,120 <br /> <br /> 1,905 1,905 <br /> 495 3,000* <br /> <br /> 2,400 4,905 <br /> <br /> 102 Not Given <br /> 300 Not Given <br /> <br />* Based on Metropolitan.Council assumption of 3.5 persons/household. <br /> <br />As noted in the Plan Overview, Ramsay expects about 1,250 new households or some <br />8,375 persons to locate in its Urban Service Area as well as commercial, industrial <br />and conservation land uses. <br /> <br />The issue of population forecasts and related metropolitan sewer system capacity <br />has been discussed with Ramsay d~ring conferences on the City's Preliminary System <br />Statement. The City has been notified that the current forecasts are being re- <br />evaluated and that a revision upwards in the forecast for Ramsay is likely. Re- <br />vised forecasts will be ready for discussion with Ramsay in March or April. They <br />may not be quite as high as the 18,000 residents projected by Ramsay. Ramsay has <br />experienced rapid growth since 1970. One of the major reasons for this has been <br />that relatively inexpensive housing could be built in the City because it had no <br />urban services. Now that Ramsey is planning to provide urban servicds to a portion <br />of the City, that serviced land must compete for development with serviced land in <br />neighboring communities of Anoka, Champlin, Andover, and Coon Rapids. If develop- <br />ment in Ramsay is chanelled to its Urban Service Area and controlled in the Transi- <br />tion Area, it is unlikely that the growth rates of the past few years will be sus- <br />tained. Ramsay will continue to grow, but the rate will likely be slower and dic- <br />tated in part by the City's fiscal capability to expand urban services. <br /> <br />Ramsay is justifiably concerned with prolonging the current development moratorium <br />in the proposed Urban Service Area and would like to rezone the area as soon as <br />possible to conform to the plan. Staff feels that the size of the proposed Urban <br />Area will not be significantly out of scale with the revised forecasts and should <br />not be a major concern to the Cohncil, since the timing of sewer extensions, and <br />not the ultimate size of the area, will really influence the amount of development. <br />Therefore, it is incumbent on the City to designate priority development areas <br />by five-year periods within the Urban Service Area before land is rezoned to in- <br />dicate where investments in urban services will be made first. Th~' size of these <br />staged growth areas should be in scale with reasonable growth projections by five- <br />year periods. Also~ before it rezones the urban service area, the City should <br />take another look at soil conditions and try to relate its conservation zones directly <br />to the soils that are unsuitable or have restrictions for urban development. The <br />Anoka County Soil Conservation Service should be able to assist the City in obtaining <br />and interpreting soil maps of Ramsay. <br /> <br />Timing <br /> <br />The timing of Ramsey's proposed Urban Service Area is inconsistent with the Devel- <br />opment Framework. The Development Framework indicates that part of Ramsey is planned <br /> <br /> <br />