My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council Work Session - 12/12/2017
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council Work Session
>
2017
>
Agenda - Council Work Session - 12/12/2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 3:40:25 PM
Creation date
12/13/2017 9:00:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
12/12/2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
162
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
agreement. <br />Independent Auto's current rent rate is below market. If this lease is renewed per the original lease <br />agreement language, it would stay below market rates. If the City moved forward with a lease renewal, <br />staff would strongly recommend all property maintenance be the responsibility of the tenant (including <br />structural). In other words, the tenant is taking the property as -is. Staff would support working with <br />Independent Auto before this lease renewal, to see what items need to be fixed. The City may be able <br />to participate in a one time upfront limited property maintenance investment (for example, <br />not -to -exceed $10,000). We do have some limited surplus RALF funds available from this lease <br />agreement. However, staff would not support ongoing/ open-ended property maintenance responsibility <br />based on this lease rate. <br />(2) Zoning code and building code compliance. <br />Code compliance has been a problem with 6745 (storage of inoperable vehicles, amount of stored vehicles, <br />storage of tires, exposed electrical wires, oil -water separates, building safety items, etc.). More specifically, <br />who's responsible for addressing what code compliance issues, and when (tenant or landlord)? Staff would <br />like to clarify/ re -write language pertaining to this item in the new lease agreement. This would specifically <br />include a default process/ penalties/ inspections. The City will require the tenant to keep the property/ <br />building up to code, at their cost, moving forward. <br />(3) Late rent payments. <br />Late rent payments have been an ongoing item with this lease agreement. The existing lease language doesn't <br />have a late fee, for late rent payments. This item will be addressed within the new lease agreement. If <br />violations exist, the City will have enforcement/ default provisions within the lease. <br />Staff would note: Independent Auto is a valued Ramsey business. They began their operations from a <br />"home -based -business" in the 2000's. Their rent helps pay property taxes, they have created jobs, and they provide <br />a good business service to our community. Staff has received positive feedback from the community RE <br />Independent Auto's service/ price/ quality. Additionally, Independent Auto has volunteered at several <br />city -sponsored events (police reserves). <br />ALTERNATIVES <br />(A) Do not renew the lease. <br />Allow the current lease term to expire. In this scenario, due to the status of the building, staff would <br />recommend consideration of demolishing and cleaning up the site. Independent Auto is opposed to this <br />option. <br />(B) Renew the lease, at the rent rate outlined in the original agreement. <br />Tenant is in favor of this option, and feels this is what was agreed to by the City. The original lease <br />agreement shows a provision allowing for a 3-year extension, at the existing lease rate. As mentioned, the <br />lease agreement also includes provisions that allow the City to not renew the lease agreement. If this <br />alterative is selected, staff would strongly recommend a complete rewrite of the lease agreement, to address <br />the items outlined in the observations section of this case; and to come into compliance with the City's <br />template lease agreement. <br />(C) Renew the lease, and adjust the rent rate up to market. <br />Staff anticipates the tenant would be opposed to this option, that it would be a hardship for the tenant's <br />operations, that the tenant would feel this alternative is unfair treatment, and would be a deviation from the <br />original agreement. It's staffs assumption, if the tenant were to be accepting of this option, they would likely <br />want the City to be responsible for all/most property maintenance. Due to the poor shape of the building, and <br />the status of the relationship with the tenant/ history, staff does not recommend this alterative. This <br />alternative would expose the City to a significant liability, which is known to be well over $100,000. And, it <br />would expose staff to a large workload (i.e. trouble shooting maintenance requests and managing <br />maintenance projects requests on a regular basis). <br />Timeframe: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.