My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 06/12/2017 - Special
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2017
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 06/12/2017 - Special
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:28:31 AM
Creation date
12/13/2017 1:46:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Title
Special
Document Date
06/12/2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Rodney A Lee <br />City of Ramsey Commercial Property Owner <br />Tim Gladhill <br />Community Development Director <br />City of Ramsey <br />7550 Sunwood Dr. NW <br />Ramsey, MN 55303 <br />Mr. Gladhill, <br />The basis of this letter is to show support for the proposed development by Paxmar. As a <br />property owner, I see many benefits to the City, Residents and Businesses. <br />The proposed development has multiple housing styles and price points. A variety of housing <br />product types and builders in the community will be a great draw to potential buyers/residents. <br />Ramsey has many great attributes and an increased housing stock seems to be needed to meet <br />demand. The proposed development has a bit more density than the R-1 zoning, but it fits the <br />location. A development with multiple housing types would complement not only the existing <br />Single Family to the east, but the business park to the south, busy Alpine Road to the north, and <br />proposed multifamily to the west. <br />Along with a higher density, also comes an increase in City fees and property tax revenues. <br />With the City having a per lot/unit fee structure, every additional unit means increased fee <br />revenue. The tax valuation will also be higher with the increased density, leading to more <br />property taxes. <br />The proposed development would also speed up the Puma Street project. Any reductions in the <br />amount Puma is under construction should be welcomed by the City. <br />All in all, the proposed development seems like a great fit for the location and I urge the City <br />representatives to approve the project. <br />Sincerely, <br />V <br />Rodney A Lee <br />Broker/Owner <br />Premier Commercial Properties <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.