My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 11/23/2004
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2004
>
Minutes - Council - 11/23/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 2:57:28 PM
Creation date
12/9/2004 11:49:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
11/23/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
substitute transportation authority when it wants the land to do a transportation project. Another <br />method is if MnDOT abandons the program for the expansion of Highway 10, the property is <br />sold on the open market and the amount received by the City will be paid to the Metropolitan <br />Council. Under no circumstances does City money need to be used to repay the loan. The same <br />is true of the Miller property. The cost to demo the building will be roughly $10,000. The loan <br />amount is at $359,000 and $340,000 will be paid to the landowner. He advised the City must <br />keep all the property acquired under the Ralf Fund Program insured on their liability policy and <br />they need to do minor maintenance. <br /> <br />Co uncilmember Kurak inquired what would be done with the buildings on the Miller property. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich replied $10,000 is included for demolition costs. If the Council wanted <br />to they could rent the property out, but the :proceeds would go to the Metropolitan Council. <br /> <br />Councihnember Elvig indicated he understands the desire not to own structures on this particular <br />process. However, he would hate to see the City mowing all of the properties down on Highway <br />10, as they do not lmow how long this will take. He agrees with moving fmwvard on this, but in <br />the future they should further discuss the demolition on properties. <br /> <br />Councihnember Zimmerman asked if the rental proceeds that would go to the Metropolitan <br />Council are for the reduction of the loan. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich replied he does not think it reduces the amount of the loan. <br /> <br />Counci hnember Zimmerman requested that this be verified. <br /> <br />Councihnember Elvig indicated the tax base and jobs involved are considerations to take into <br />account. <br /> <br />Councihncmber Cook questioned if the entire amount of the sale would go to the Metropolitan <br />Council, including all the equity, if they were not to move on with the highway improvements <br />arid were to sell the lot. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich indicated he would interpret the agreement to mean that all of the <br />proceeds would go to the Metropolitan Council. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak inquired what the situation would be if the property were to sell for a <br />lesser amount. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich replied the loan would still be finished. <br /> <br />Cmmcihnember Kurak asked who would pay for any maintenance involved in renting out the <br />building. <br /> <br />City Council/November 23, 2004 <br /> Page 14 of 17 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.