My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Comp Plan 1981-1983 FILE #3
>
Comprehensive Plan
>
Comprehensive Plan (old)
>
1980-1989
>
Comp Plan 1981-1983 FILE #3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2018 9:33:25 AM
Creation date
12/9/2004 1:41:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Engineering
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
234
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
- 15 - <br /> <br />VII. <br /> <br />review. That plan should address the additional comments raised <br />by the MWCC. <br /> <br />The plan appears generally compatible with the plans of adjacent <br />and affected units. Comments of a local nature have been raised <br />by the City of Anoka. These concerns should be worked out <br />between the cities. <br /> <br />E. The plan relates to other Metropolitan Development Guide chapters as <br /> follows: <br /> <br />The plan is consistent with the Metropolitan Development <br />Framework, the Protection Open Space and Water Resources chapters <br />of the Metropolitan Development Guide, Council policies for <br />stormwater management, and the Housing chapter of the Metropolitan <br />Development Guide. In accordance with Minnesota Statutes <br />473.206, the city should send new or modified environmental <br />ordinances to the Council for review prior to adoption. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />The CIP meets the requirements of MSA 473.852, Subdivision 4, <br />except that the following information should be added to the <br />CIP. At such time as the city amends its CIP (at least <br />biennially), it should forward the amended version to the <br />Council for review and comment. <br /> <br />a. The CIP should contain a statement of the need for each <br /> project. <br /> <br />b. The CIP should include a statement of the financial impact <br /> each improvement will have on the city. <br /> <br />According to Minnesota Statutes, Section 473.811, Subdivision 5, <br />Ramsey should adopt an appropriate ordinance or reference a <br />county ordinance governing solid waste collection and disposal in <br />the city. <br /> <br />ADVISORY COMMENTS ON LOCAL PARK SYSTEM <br /> <br />The city has 264 acres of city-owned park land as well as an additional <br />334 acres of county/regional and school district recreation land. The <br />city has an adequate amount of park land to the year 1990 and has not <br />proposed any additional acquisition. <br /> <br />The city's park and recreation capital improvement program proposes Land <br />and Water Conservation Funds (LAWCON) to be used in 1983 for the city's <br />community playfield. The city should be aware that Council Development <br />Framework policy discourages the use of LAWCON funds for the development <br />of parks outside the urban service areas, such as this one. Alternative <br />funding sources should be considered. <br /> <br />AO95P3 <br />PHDEV2 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.