Laserfiche WebLink
TH10 fntarregional Corridor Study <br /> <br />PQL/CY ADVtSQRY CQM,,lfliTTE--_ <br /> ' · '~ "~' "~, 2~0~ from <br />SOM;~,[~,~."f MiNU%E$ OF ME~T/NG ~ (~,~./ ~0, 7:00 <br /> <br /> Elk ~iver, Minnesota <br /> <br />ISSUES IDENTIFIED TO DATE (cont) <br /> <br />La <br /> <br />nd Use and right-of-way (ROW) Issues, <br /> <br />Need to understand Mn/DOT's plans for corridor <br />and/or new river crossing in order to preserve <br />land for future right-of-way (ROW) <br /> <br />Concerned about how TH 10 and other major <br />roads "separate" cities into several distinct pieces <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />Concerned about how TH t0 and railroad divide <br />up land into parcels that are difficult to develop <br /> <br />Concerned that expansion of TH 10 would result <br />in the removal of businesses and pedestrian <br />amenities <br /> <br />,5. Concerned that cities are not actively thinking <br /> about bypass options ¢O'd in TAC lVleetir~g) <br /> <br />6. Concerned about differences in zoning practices <br /> between Anoka and Sherburne counties (~o'd in <br /> TAC Meeting) <br /> <br />7. Cities, Counties, and Mn/DOT need to-coordinate <br /> their planning (IO'd in ?AC Meeting) <br /> <br />m <br /> <br />50 Page 8 of i4 <br /> <br /> <br />