My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 07/06/2017
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2017
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 07/06/2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:28:38 AM
Creation date
12/27/2017 4:29:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
07/06/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
495
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Planner Anderson confirmed that there is a very thin line of vegetation that acts as a buffer. <br />Board Member Hiatt stated that perhaps the additional landscaping and development could <br />improve the quality of the existing lots. <br />Councilmember LeTourneau stated that the 50-foot buffer is a nice addition to the project. He <br />stated that the neighborhood is talking about creating a discussion with the City to acquire the <br />woods to protect that from development in perpetuity. <br />City Planner Anderson stated that he is not requesting formal action because the information was <br />submitted to close to the meeting date and therefore the Board did not have time to thoroughly <br />review the information as it was just presented tonight. <br />5.05: Receive Update on The COR Interim Development Plan <br />City Planner Anderson presented the staff report. He stated that the purpose of this case is to <br />review a preliminary draft of The COR Interim Development Plan, which essentially puts into <br />motion a more formal amendment to the Master Plan. He noted that details of the <br />recommendations prepared by the Planning Commission over a series of workshops were <br />attached to the case. He noted that the direction form the April 25, 2017 Joint Work Session was <br />to review this draft with the advisory Boards and Commissions. He stated that the draft was <br />review by the Economic Development Authority on May 25, 2017 and by the Parks and <br />Recreation Commission at their June 8, 2017 meeting. He advised that staff will be seeking <br />authorization for public comment on the draft in July. <br />Board Member Valentine commented that the plan is coming along nicely. <br />Chairperson Stodola asked for more information on the boundaries of The COR. <br />City Planner Anderson provided the boundaries of The COR, explaining that some of The COR <br />zoning extends past those boundaries. <br />Councilmember LeTourneau stated that one of the driving factors of the Council is the market, <br />noting that the development will have to be market driven. He explained that the big box retail <br />that was originally desired will not fit into The COR because of the challenges that exist lying <br />between two retail nodes and other market factors. He noted that the other factors that bring in <br />business is density and that is why additional housing is being considered. <br />City Planner Anderson stated that while residents have said they do not want more apartments in <br />The COR, additional rooftops are needed to attract business and that is the quickest method. He <br />noted that the original plan for The COR included apartments because that would concentrate <br />density and allow other portions of the City to remain more rural. <br />Councilmember LeTourneau noted that this has been a balance approach with market rate <br />apartments. <br />Environmental Policy Board / June 19, 2017 <br />Page 9of11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.