Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning Bulletin June 10, 2017 I Volume 11 I Issue 11 <br />of the zoning ordinance <br />Citation: Dartmouth Corporation of Alpha Delta v. Town of Hanover, <br />2017 WL 1346944 (N.H. 2017) <br />NEW HAMPSHIRE (04/11/17)—This case addressed the issue of <br />whether, upon the derecognition of a fraternity as a student organization, <br />the use of the fraternity's property as as a student residence violated a zon- <br />ing ordinance that required that student residences in a particular zoning <br />district operate "in conjunction with another institutional use." <br />The Background/Facts: Dartmouth Corporation of Alpha Delta <br />("Alpha Delta" or the "fraternity") had been a fraternity for students at <br />Dartmouth College ("College") since the 1840s. In 1911, Alpha Delta <br />began housing students who were members of the fraternity. In 1920, <br />Alpha Delta built its current housing structure (the "Fraternity House"). <br />Since then, Alpha Delta had used the Fraternity House to house ap- <br />proximately 18-22 College undergraduate students who were members of <br />the fraternity. <br />In 1976, the Town of Hanover (the "Town") enacted its current zoning <br />ordinance (the "Ordinance"). Under the Ordinance, the Fraternity House <br />was located within the "Institution" zoning district. A student residence in <br />the Institution district is allowed only by special exception. The Ordinance <br />defines a "student residence" in the Institution district as "[a] building <br />designed for and occupied by students and operated in conjunction with <br />another institutional use, which may include individual living units with <br />social rooms and kitchen facilities for any number of students." Alpha <br />Delta had never sought a special exception for the use of the Fraternity <br />House. <br />On April 13, 2015, the College notified Alpha Delta that, "due to the <br />fraternity's violation of the school's standards of conduct, it had revoked <br />recognition of the fraternity as a student organization." The College had <br />discovered that Alpha Delta had a practice of branding new fraternity <br />members with the Alpha Delta fraternity letters. Among other things, the <br />College's "derecognition" of Alpha Delta as a student organization <br />revoked from Alpha Delta certain privileges including: "recognition as a <br />`college approved' residential facility; use of College facilities or re- <br />sources; . . . and provision of insurance coverage." The College also noti- <br />fied Alpha Delta that it "would no longer be under the jurisdiction or <br />protection of the College's department of safety and security." <br />Ten days later, the Town's zoning administrator notified Alpha Delta <br />that, because the College had derecognized Alpha Delta, Alpha Delta's use <br />of the property violated the zoning Ordinance. The zoning administrator <br />cited the fact that the Ordinance required that student residences in the <br />Institution zoning district be operated in conjunction with another <br />institutional use. Here, because Alpha Delta had been derecognized by the <br />College, the zoning administrator determined that the Fraternity House <br />was "no longer operated in conjunction with an institutional use," and that <br />©2017 Thomson Reuters 3 <br />