Laserfiche WebLink
While no wetlands are indicated on the National Wetlands Inventory, the Engineering Department believes that <br />there may be wetland present as a result of drainage patterns in the area. As noted in their Staff Review Memo, they <br />are requesting a wetland delineation be completed. <br />Density Transitioning: <br />As proposed, the development is not subject to the density transitioning standards. However, it is worth noting that <br />there is an existing line of mature evergreen trees along the entire length of the eastern boundary of the Property <br />that does provide some buffering/screening between the proposed project and the existing homes. <br />Streets and Access: <br />Six of the eight lots will gain access from an extension of the 168th Lane NW cul-de-sac. The existing home and <br />the proposed Lot 4, Block 1 will be accessed from 168th Avenue Northwest. It appears that the proposed extension <br />of 168th Lane NW terminates in a temporary cul-de-sac (labeled as such on the plans). Staff would note that this <br />cul-de-sac will need to be constructed to meet the minimum street design standards of cul-de-sacs and shall have <br />the necessary 60 foot radius right-of-way dedicated per City Code Sec. 117-614. This will likely affect lot size of <br />Lot 3 Block 1 and Lot 3 Block 2 at a minimum. <br />As the Planning Commission is aware, the City has struggled with temporary cul-de-sacs in the past as it is <br />uncertain when a road may be extended to facilitate future development. In recent years, the City has been put in a <br />position of responding to variance requests to allow lots to become buildable because the owner cannot control <br />when adjacent land will develop, which would extend a road and eliminate the cul-de-sac. Multiple discussions <br />have been had on this topic and the policy direction at this time is to require any proposed cul-de-sac to be <br />designed and constructed to the minimum standards, which does include dedicating right-of-way with a radius of <br />sixty (60) feet for the cul-de-sac bulb. It is further noted that the City is not aware of any plans of the Property <br />Owner to the east to develop, so future extension of this road to eliminate the cul-de-sac is purely speculative. In the <br />case of the existing temporary cul-de-sac, the City was aware of the Cole's desire to develop and was actively <br />working to extend the road and utilities to this site. <br />The property owner has been contemplating a subdivision for several years and had, at one time, submitted a <br />concept plan to the City that was generally consistent with the proposed Preliminary Plat. At the time of the concept <br />plan, the discussions about temporary cul-de-sacs hadn't fully evolved. Nonetheless, that is the policy direction that <br />Staff is operating under now and therefore, we feel it important to remain consistent. <br />Sidewalks: <br />The Preliminary Plat does not include any indication of a sidewalk along the proposed extension of 168th Lane. <br />There is an existing sidewalk on the north side of 168th Lane that ends at the intersection with Kamacite Street. <br />There is an existing lot east of this intersection, but outside the boundaries of the Preliminary Plat, with no <br />sidewalk. Staff is recommending that sidewalk be installed along the north side of the 168th Lane extension to the <br />bulb of the cul-de-sac. Staff is open to discussion about credit for the sidewalk outside the boundary of the Plat. <br />Utilities and Municipal Services: <br />The applicant proposes connecting the new lots to city services, but has not specified whether the existing home <br />will be connected. The assumption is that Lot 5, Block 2 would connect to city services as the Preliminary Plat does <br />indicate that the private utilities would be abandoned, but does not include details pertaining to the connection of <br />existing home. <br />Grading and Drainage: <br />The project will be subject to review by the Lower Rum River Watershed Management Organization (LRRWMO) <br />regarding both wetlands and stomrwater. A LRRWMO permit will be required. <br />The Applicant proposes to vacate a fairly large, existing drainage easement (130 feet by 115 feet in area) on the <br />Subject Property. The Grading and Drainage Plans will need to clearly resolve how the stormwater would be <br />addressed so that it does not negatively impact adjacent properties or move outside designated easements. The <br />Applicant's civil engineer, Landform, has since proposed improvements to ensure proper drainage in a memo. This <br />memo has been reviewed by the Engineering Staff as part of the Preliminary Plat process. Engineering staff feel <br />