Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning Bulletin November 10, 2017 I Volume 11 I Issue 21 <br />The court also found that the FAA regulations preempted the Ordinance's <br />ban on drone use below an altitude of 400 feet and over private property <br />without the express permission of the owner of the private property and over <br />public property without prior permission from the City. The court found that <br />those provisions of the Ordinance worked in tandem to "create an essential <br />ban on drone use within the limits of the [City]," since the FAA mandated that <br />drone operators keep drones below an altitude of 400 feet from the ground or a <br />structure (see 14 C.F.R. § 107.51). In other words, given the FAA mandate, <br />the City's ban on drone use below an altitude of 400 feet essentially eliminated <br />any drone use in the confines of the City, absent prior permission. <br />Finally, the court found that the FAA regulations preempted the Ordinance's <br />ban on drone use "at a distance beyond the visual line of sight of the Operator." <br />The court pointed to FAA rules regarding aircraft safety and the visual line of <br />sight for pilotless aircraft operation (see 14 C.F.R. §§ 107.31 and 107.205), <br />and determined that the Ordinance "limit[ed] the methods of piloting a drone <br />beyond that which the FAA has already designated, while also reaching into <br />navigable space." <br />Case Note: <br />In its decision, the court noted that the remaining, unchallenged portions of the <br />Ordinance "stand." <br />Zoning News from Around the <br />Nation <br />CALIFORNIA <br />In late September, Governor Jerry Brown signed into law 15 bills aimed at <br />addressing the "affordable housing crises." Among those new laws are: Senate <br />Bi11 35, which requires cities approve "projects that comply with existing zon- <br />ing if not enough housing has been built to keep pace with their state home- <br />building targets"; Assembly Bill 73, which provides that a "city receives <br />money when it designates a particular community for more housing and then <br />additional dollars once it starts issuing permits for new homes" provided at <br />least 20% of the housing is reserved for low- or middle -income residents, <br />"and projects will have to be granted permits without delay if they meet zon- <br />ing standards"; Senate Bill 540, which "authorizes a state grant or loan for a <br />local government to do planning and environmental reviews to cover a partic- <br />ular neighborhood," provided the developers in the designated community <br />reserve a certain percentage of homes for low- and middle -income residents <br />"and the city's approvals there would be approved without delay"; Assembly <br />Bill 1505, which allows cities to "once again implement low-income require- <br />ments," forcing developers to set aside a percentage of their projects for low- <br />income residents; Assembly Bill 1397, which "forces local governments to <br />zone land for [buildable] housing"; Senate Bill 166, which requires cities to <br />© 2017 Thomson Reuters 11 <br />