Laserfiche WebLink
Regular Planning Commission <br />Meeting Date: 12/07/2017 <br />By: Tim Gladhill, Community Development <br />6. 3. <br />Information <br />Title: <br />ADDED: Review Rum River Hills Redevelopment Concept <br />Purpose/Background: <br />The purpose of this case is to review a proposed redevelopment project of a portion of the Rum River Hills Golf <br />Course. Please note that this redevelopment proposal would only impact two (2) existing golf course holes, not the <br />entire golf course. The two (2) impacted golf course holes would be relocated and Rum River Hills would continue <br />to operate as an eighteen (18) hole golf course. The scope of this case is to consider high level feedback before any <br />official review. Similar to other concept plan reviews completed recently, this is not intended to be an in depth <br />review. The intent is to also agree on a schedule and process moving forward. <br />The City hosted a broader public engagement session in 2013. The scope of that workshop was to explore strategies <br />to improve the image of the retail node at 167th Avenue and Saint Francis Boulevard (Trunk Highway 47). At that <br />workshop, this concept was shared by Rum River Hills. However, this workshop was never published with the <br />development concept in mind or specific to Rum River Hills. Given that the proposal is a change to the <br />Comprehensive Plan (extend the urban service area; increase density), Staff recommends that a public engagement <br />session focused on the Rum River Hills proposal be advertised for January 4, 2018. <br />Rum River Hills is also requesting certain financial assistance for this project. With this in mind, the project will <br />also be reviewed by the Economic Development Authority (EDA) and City Council in advance/parallel to the <br />Planning Commission's review of the Land Use Application. <br />Notification: <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />The following are some high-level talking points to consider: <br />1. What is the compelling reason for the change to the Comprehensive Plan? <br />1. Will it help advance the City's goals to improve the retail node at 167th Avenue/Saint Francis <br />Boulevard? <br />2. Rum River Hills proposed a pedestrian tunnel/underpass at 167th Avenue/Saint Francis Boulevard. It is <br />anticipated that the City will be asked to cost -share or pay 100% of this improvement. <br />3. Density Transitioning <br />4. Physical Barriers <br />1. Wetlands <br />2. Gas Transmission Line <br />Overall, Staff believes there is some merit to this project. However, Staff believes there needs to be additional <br />public input specific to the development proposal prior to formulating any recommendations. Staff understands that <br />there has been some public engagement surrounding the proposal on a broader sense, but Staff believes it is <br />important to frame this engagement and publish specific to Rum River Hill's proposal. Previously, the proposal has <br />been shared by Rum River Hills at a broader community workshop. The City has never published this proposal <br />specifically for public comment from a land use application perspective. <br />Funding Source: <br />