My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 08/03/2017
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2017
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 08/03/2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:28:44 AM
Creation date
12/28/2017 9:28:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
08/03/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
335
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Zoning Bulletin June 25, 2017 I Volume 11 I Issue 12 <br />(Emphasis added). Regardless of whether any particular group that <br />rented from the Homeowners met the definition of a "family," the court <br />concluded that "the transient nature of the rentals resulted in the houses <br />being `occupied by . . . more than one family,' " which was a non - <br />permitted use under the applicable zoning regulations. <br />Accordingly, the court concluded that the Homeowners' rental of <br />their houses for occupancies by a succession of short-term, transient <br />renters was inconsistent with the permitted use of a "single family <br />dwelling." <br />Applicability of Zoning <br />Regulations Billboard <br />company seeks changes to <br />billboards it claims qualify as a <br />legal nonconforming use <br />protected by a grandfathering <br />statute <br />Government contends applicable billboard <br />regulations are safety regulations and not zoning <br />regulations and are therefore not subject to <br />grandfathering <br />Citation: Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson <br />County v. Board of Zoning Appeals of Nashville and Davidson County, <br />2017 WL 1655597 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017) <br />TENNESEE (05/02/17)—This case addressed the issue of whether <br />an ordinance governing static display billboards and digital display <br />billboards was a zoning ordinance to which a state statutory grandfather <br />clause may apply, or a safety ordinance to which the grandfather clause <br />would not come into play. <br />The Background/Facts: CBS Outdoor, Inc. ("CBS") owned bill- <br />boards in the City of Nashville (the "City"). CBS sought to replace two <br />existing static display billboards with two digital display billboards. In <br />furtherance of that goal, CBS applied to the Department of Codes and <br />Building Safety (the "Department") of the Metropolitan Government of <br />Nashville and Davidson County ("Metro"). The Department denied the <br />© 2017 Thomson Reuters 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.