My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 08/03/2017
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2017
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 08/03/2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:28:44 AM
Creation date
12/28/2017 9:28:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
08/03/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
335
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
do they use development impact fees as the <br />mechanism for funding necessary local infra- <br />structure and services. <br />Although this article examines develop- <br />ment impact fees, there are several other <br />types of exactions that local governments can <br />impose on landowners and developers that <br />agencies and planners should be aware of and <br />understand. <br />In -Lieu Fees <br />Local governments use "in -lieu" fees to allow <br />for the paymentofa fee in exchange for an <br />exemption from compliance with a particular <br />zoning ordinance or (and -use regulation. Thus, <br />such fees are said to be paid in lieu of compli- <br />ance with a particular ordinance or regulation. <br />The use of impact fees by local governments <br />arose from the use of in -lieu fees. <br />For example, suppose the developer of <br />a residential use in an urban area desires to <br />construct a high -density project but cannot (or <br />doesn't want to) provide the minimum number <br />of parking spaces that would be required by <br />the zoning code. In exchange for the payment <br />of an in -lieu fee, the local government could <br />approve the project with a reduced number of - <br />parking spaces. <br />The developer would then pay into a fund <br />comprised of in -lieu fees from other projects, <br />which the government could use to construct <br />a parking garage for multiple nearby residen- <br />tial developments. <br />Another common example is when the <br />developerofa proposed residential project <br />wants to avoid having to comply with the <br />provision of low- or moderate -income units in <br />accordance with an inclusionary housing ordi- <br />nance. In exchange for the payment of an in - <br />lieu fee, the local government could approve <br />the project without the minimum number of <br />required low- or moderate -income units. The <br />local government could then use pooled in - <br />lieu fees to develop a project that provides <br />affordable housing. <br />Compensatory Mitigation Fees <br />Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies <br />use mitigation fees to compensate for impacts <br />to the habitats of animal and plant species <br />that will be affected by development. Federal <br />or state regulatory agencies often use these <br />fees in conjunction with environmental pro- <br />grams, such as multispecies habitat conserva- <br />tion plans. <br />Consider a development project that will <br />be constructed on previously undisturbed <br />land that is the home to a certain species of <br />lizard. Federal or state regulatory agencies <br />may require a developer to pay a mitigation <br />fee to compensate for the damage to the liz- <br />ard's habitat. The agency could then use this <br />fee to improve or protect areas of the lizard's <br />habitat located elsewhere. <br />Some states have extensive programs <br />that oversee the payment of compensatory <br />mitigation fees into "banks." This approach is <br />known as mitigation or conservation banking. <br />Affordable Housing or 'Linkage' Fees <br />New development often results new low -wage <br />jobs. However, in many cities, the workers <br />who perform these jobs are not able to afford <br />housing due to high rental costs. In recogni- <br />tion of this link between new development <br />and affordable housing demand, some local <br />governments require developers to pay "link- <br />age" fees into an affordable housing fund. <br />Although affordable housing fees are a <br />type of impact fee, these fees are distinguish- <br />able because the fees do not result in the <br />improvement or expansion of public facilities <br />and infrastructure. <br />Special Taxes <br />A special tax generally refers to a tax levied <br />for a specific purpose, rather than a tax levied <br />and then placed into the general fund. Special <br />taxes must be approved by a two-thirds major- <br />ity of the qualified voters in the service area, <br />which is usually the jurisdictional area of the <br />local government agency that initiates the <br />special tax. <br />The amount of the special tax is nottypi- <br />cally limited to the relative benefit it provides <br />to property owners or taxpayers. <br />Often, local governments levy special <br />taxes on a per -parcel basis, either according <br />to the square footage of the parcel or as a flat <br />charge, although the laws in many jurisdic- <br />tions commonly provide flexibility to levy the <br />special tax on any "reasonable basis." More- <br />over, local governments commonly levy spe- <br />cial taxes to obtain funds for services such as <br />libraries, hospitals, schools, fire protection, <br />and public safety. <br />Special Assessments <br />A special assessment is a charge levied <br />against real property that is particularly and <br />directly benefited by a local improvement, in <br />order to pay for the cost of that improvement. <br />The rationale of a special assessment is that <br />the assessed property has received a special <br />benefit over and above that received by the <br />general public; the local improvement, such <br />as the paving or lighting of a street, directly <br />benefits and increases the value of adjacent <br />real property. The public should not be re- <br />quired to pay for special benefits for the few, <br />and the few specially benefited should not be <br />subsidized by the general public. <br />Generally speaking, a special assess- <br />ment may be a fixed sum. Alternatively, a <br />special assessment may be an amount that <br />ZONINGPRACTICE 7.17 <br />AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION j page 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.