Laserfiche WebLink
City Planner Anderson presented the Staff Report stating the purpose of this case is to review a <br />Sketch Plan for a proposed 24 lot detached single-family subdivision located at the intersection of <br />Armstrong Blvd and Tiger Street (PIDs 07-32-25-14-0001 and 07-32-25-13-0001, together, the <br />"Subject Property"). The Subject Property is zoned R-1 Residential (Rural Developing) and the <br />subject lots would be serviced by private well and septic services. Staff commented further on the <br />proposal and requested feedback on the Sketch Plan. <br />Commission Business <br />Chairperson Bauer stated he was open to considering a variance. <br />Commissioner VanScoy agreed and asked if a portion of the land could be dedicated to Park <br />Dedication fees. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill explained this was not part of the City's plan. <br />Commissioner VanScoy commented he could support the addition of one more lot. <br />Commissioner Anderson asked if the outlot was large enough to have well and septic. <br />City Planner Anderson stated the lot was 1.78 acres in size. He explained soil borings would be <br />necessary to ensure the land could support well and septic, but noted the size of the lot was <br />adequate. <br />Commissioner Anderson indicated he would like to see the developer alter the lots so as to conform <br />with the City's current zoning and lot size requirements. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill stated staff could look at the lot width requirements <br />for lots on a cul-de-sac which would assist the developer in not losing a lot on the cul-de-sac. <br />Commissioner VanScoy asked if staff had considered any other configuration for the cul-de-sac. <br />City Planner Anderson reported staff had not drafted any alternative plans. <br />Eric Thomsen, 6210 Green Valley Road, stated he would be willing to increase the frontage along <br />the cul-de-sac and could adjust the lot sizes. <br />Bob Bentz, 8881 167th Lane, stated he lived just south of the proposed development. He explained <br />he has spoken to his neighbors and was surprised that the Commission was discussing this matter <br />as no notification was given to the neighbors. He expressed concern with how this development <br />would impact wildlife. He commented on how this rural development would impact the water <br />table through everyday water usage and lawn irrigation. He feared at some point the City would <br />be pulling out more water than it recharges. <br />Planning Commission/November 2, 2017 <br />Page 3 of 13 <br />