Laserfiche WebLink
(6) Performance Requirements <br />These assistance requests are being made by RRH based on how this project will help the 167/47 Node. Staff <br />feels it's appropriate to make performance requirements a part of this project. Meaning, the developer must <br />deliver XYZ by ABC date in order to receive City assistance. If the developer doesn't perform, what penalties/ <br />claw -backs should exist? Staff wants to avoid this item being an afterthought, and come up at the end of the <br />negotiation process. Staff thinks the City's expectations should be set upfront. Staff would also ask for <br />direction to develop a recommendation on this item. The EDA reaffirmed this suggestion on 12/14/2017. <br />(7) Get the Deal on Paper <br />Staff would suggest the Council provide general direction to negotiate a 'draft version' of a formal purchase <br />agreement. Depending on where we settle, this too will effect staffs recommendation on this project. At this <br />point, Rum River Hills is informally offering about 30K per usable acre, and about $7,500 per acre for <br />non -buildable land. From a very preliminary perspective, this seems like a reasonable deal for the city, based <br />on the land transaction only. However, until we review an actual agreement, we are only speculating. The PA <br />would also cover other important items (proposed cost -share agreements, performance requirements, <br />infrastructure improvements, etc.). A draft PA will help everyone involved with this project better track, <br />within one document, what the deal looks like. The EDA reaffirmed this suggestion on 12/14/2017. <br />(8) Planning Commission: Land Use Items to Address <br />This project will require a zoning change and a comprehensive plan change. The Planning Commission <br />reviewed this case on 12/07/2017. The Planning is generally supportive of further reviewing this project. <br />Attached to this case is the suggested land use review process. Staff would note a few items upfront that will <br />need to be addressed during the land use review process: (A) the proposed Quicksilver alignment cuts <br />through two private property owners parcels that have yet to be contacted, (B) the proposed width and length <br />of roads don't comply with existing city code, (C) much of the proposed project is located in areas near <br />wetlands and staff would recommend a delineation be completed ahead of time to avoid surprises, and (D) <br />the project will likely require a traffic study for Highway 47, and may trigger intersection improvements at <br />167th. <br />(9) EDA Comment: Cost Share for Pedestrian Underpass <br />As proposed by the developer, the City would pay 100% for the pedestrian underpass. At the EDA meeting <br />on 12/14/2017, a couple EDA members suggested the pedestrian underpass be cost -shared. EDA members <br />felt the underpass serves two functions: (A) a public use, and (B) a private golf course use. As a result, is was <br />suggested costs should be split. Staff will ask Rum River Hills to respond to this request before this case is <br />brought back again. The EDA has also requested the developer better indicate how this underpass will serve <br />the greater community (i.e. clearly map out the proposed connections). <br />(10) Review by other Commissions <br />The EDA, Planning Commission, and staff have suggested this project be reviewed by other appropriate <br />boards and commissions as well, moving forward. Specifically, the Parks Board has been identified --due to <br />the proximity of this project to Elmcrest Park. <br />Funding Source: <br />Recommendation: <br />Staff, the Planning Commission (12/07/2017), and the EDA (12/14/2017) have reviewed this case. Please see <br />observations section for a summary of feedback. It appears all three parties generally feel the preliminary concept <br />proposal has merit and are generally comfortable with further reviewing this project --assuming the 10 items <br />identified in the observation section can be addressed. <br />Staff would also note that Rum River Hills is a valued local business. They have provided the community a <br />quality golf course, pro -shop, and bar/ restaurant for decades. They employ several people and pay <br />significant property taxes. Rum River Hills is proposing a project that they feel will not only benefit them, but <br />the greater Ramsey community. Staff has enjoyed working with Rum River Hills through this development <br />proposal process and has a great deal of respect for their investments in Ramsey. <br />