Laserfiche WebLink
Community Development Director Gladhill agreed that perhaps different language could be used <br />and provided clarification noting that the intent was to balance the study and focus on different <br />transportation corridors within the City, such as Hwy 47, Hwy 10, and CR 5. He continued to <br />review the staff report. <br />Councilmember LeTourneau asked if the household and population estimates align with the <br />actual amount of housing space available. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill confirmed that the future land use plan was used to <br />make that estimated determination of population. He continued to review the staff report and <br />provide an update on the process and draft plan. He noted that because a substantial amount of <br />work was put into the future land use plan, little amendment will be needed for that section. He <br />provided additional input on the future developing areas staging and the implementation plan. <br />He reviewed the remaining meetings associated with the Comprehensive Plan update. <br />Councilmember LeTourneau asked if an update could be provided at the end of this meeting, if <br />time allows, on the recent open house that occurred. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill confirmed that he could give an update and noted <br />that there is a scheduled update to occur in January. <br />Councilmember LeTourneau stated that this is a huge document and great undertaking and is <br />pleased to see that the process began 18 months out to allow for the community engagement <br />portion. He stated that this is a comprehensive planning document and yet there are constantly <br />Comprehensive Plan updates, which can be confusing. He acknowledged that development is <br />market driven and hoped that there would be a better way to communicate that this document <br />should be flexible to a point. <br />Mayor Strommen stated that she views the Comprehensive Plan as a ten-year document that <br />provides information to residents. She stated that while there is flexibility in some areas, the <br />values, vision and for most part, the land use should stay as designated. She stated that perhaps <br />there is a communication plan that goes along with the document that outlines expectations. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill stated that this is a conversation that planners have <br />constantly and agreed that regular communication may help to answer those questions. <br />Councilmember Shryock agreed that adding language on the intention of the document would <br />help to clarify that this will be used as a guide and not set in stone. <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated that the process to amend the plan could perhaps be spelled out, <br />including the driving criteria. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill noted that language is not included in the current <br />plan. He noted that the process is pretty clear, but perhaps additional information to encapsulate <br />a narrative of why the plan could be amended could be drafted. <br />City Council Work Session / December 12, 2017 <br />Page 4 of 8 <br />