My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 11/15/1988
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1988
>
Agenda - Council - 11/15/1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/8/2025 12:29:34 PM
Creation date
12/16/2004 9:45:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
11/15/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
146
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CO NTY OF ANOKA <br />Offlce of lh.U~-- Countv. Board ol Comm,$slonef$ <br /> <br />COURT HOUSE ANOKA. rv'IINNESOTA55303 421-4760 <br /> Nay 31, 1988 <br /> <br />DAN ERHART - CHAIRMAN <br />County J~oor~ of Commissioners <br /> <br />Curtis A. Pearson, Esq. <br />Attorney, Lower Rum River WMO <br />Wurst, Pearson, Larson, Underwood & Mertz <br />]100 First Bank Place West <br />Minneapolis, MN 55402 <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Pearson: <br /> <br />I appreciate your letter dated May 19, 1988 regarding erosion concerns along the <br />Rum River due to motor boats using the river. <br /> <br />The County Board may be willing to consider an ordinance limiting the size <br />and/or speed of boats and motors if we knew specifically what the cities <br />comprising the Lower Rum River Watershed Management Organization wanted the <br />County to do in this regard. Perhaps the WMO could develop the basic provisions <br />regarding horsepower, speed, etc. that such an ordinance would include. You <br />could then confer with each of the four cities and secure support from each city. <br />The WMO's recommendation together with the resolutions supporting the <br />reco~nendation from each city would be sent to the County. This approach would <br />enable one joint position to be considered rather than differing opinions. You <br />would not need to be concerned about any other wate~ays elsewhere in the County; <br />individual waterways are different and could be handled separately in the future, <br />~f need be, to meet their specific situations. If the City Councils along the <br />Rum River are convinced that there is a problem and are united in its proposed <br />solution to address the particular need along the Lower Rum, the County Board <br />would give the matter serious consideration. <br /> <br />Thanks for your continuing <br /> <br />interest in~s important subject. <br /> <br /> Da,A~Erhart, Chairman <br /> Anok~ County Board of ComJr.,issioners <br /> <br />DE:db <br /> <br />cc: <br /> <br />Commissioner Natalie Haas Steffen <br />Ly]e ~.-adley <br />Para ~Ic Ca.be <br /> <br />Jay McLinden <br />5ob Johnson <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.