My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 10/25/1988
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1988
>
Agenda - Council - 10/25/1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/8/2025 12:28:46 PM
Creation date
12/16/2004 10:53:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
10/25/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
156
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
10 Minutes Case ~8: <br />REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW CASE OF HOLIDAY STATIONSTORES, INC. <br /> <br /> By: Acting Zoning Administrator Merland Otto <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />Holiday Stationstores, Inc. is requesting site plan approval of their <br />proposed facility at the intersection of Hwy. ~10 and Cty. Rd. ~56. <br />The lot is approximately 1.8 acres in size and zoned B-1 Business. <br />The Holiday Stationstore will be approximately 4,000 square feet in <br />size. <br /> <br />The following items are enclosed for your information: <br /> <br /> a) Application <br />b) Site location map <br />c) Site plan <br />d) Letter from Anoka County dated September 26, 1988 <br />e) City Engineer's report dated September 30, 1988 <br />f) Proposed development agreement. <br /> <br />Observations: <br /> <br />The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the site plan on October <br />and recommended approval of it and the proposed development agreement <br />contingent upon the Hwy. 010 access being a right-turn-in only and the <br />City Engineer's review of sto~m water drainage calculations. <br /> <br />The city Council reviewed the site plan and tabled action until <br />I,[n/DOT's review had been received and sto_--m water drainage concerns <br />had been addressed. <br /> <br />city = ~ = ~ ~ <br /> _ng_n_e_, Pete Raatikka, has discussea the H%5~ !0 access <br />]'.in/DOT. They indicated ~=t only = right turn access into the <br />p~ope_~y cfr o~ H%]~. ~0 %gould be allowable. No access from the <br />property directly to Highway !0 would be allowed. <br /> <br />Since a !i~ited access cfr cf !0 %~as not considered during County ~.~ <br /> .... ~ _s~u .... the in~ress/egress cn Cc. 5~. The <br />County Engineer's cffice i~ ~icates the: ...... <br /> nc cor~ents c 9/26 are stl±z <br />valid, i'!~ <br />*~ a~nicant ~:as re~aired to submit a cradin* and draina:e ~na~ <br />Reviev; co~3~ents will be available at the meeting. <br /> <br />uhat dedication cf a 60' right-cf-way. ~_=~ frcntace, road, <br />uni!ity easenen~s %;ou!d be unlikely due to the cost cf the <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.