Laserfiche WebLink
94 <br /> <br />Page 2 -- December 10, 2004 <br /> <br />Z,B. <br /> <br /> Adult Entertainment-- Business plans to sell small amount of adult products <br /> Most of business is a retail clothing store <br /> Citation: Giggles World Corp. v. Town of Wappinger, U.S. District Court for <br /> the Southern District of ~Vew York, No. 04 Civ. 2559(C£$) (2004) <br /> <br /> NEW YORK (10/05/04) -- Giggles World Corp. leased a building with the intent <br /> of opening a retail business. <br /> Giggles planned t© sell clothing, hosiery, lingerie, swimwear, and <br /> evenmgwear. Giggles also planned to sell a small selection of adult products, <br /> such as videos, periodicals, and other items. <br /> The Town of Wappinger Zoning Administrator found Giggles could not sell <br />adult products because the town zoning ordinance prohibited the sale of such <br />items within 400 feet of any residential zone, and Giggles' leased property was <br />within 400 feet of a residential district. <br /> Giggles sued, and the town asked the court to dismiss the lawsuit. The <br />town argued its ordinance was content-neutral and intended to regulate the <br />harmful secondary effects caused by adult businesses, nor an attempt to vio- <br />late Giggles' First 'Amendment rights. <br />DECISION: Judgment in fa'mr of Giggles. <br /> Atthough the ordinance was clearly content-neutral, the town had not proven <br />its ordinance was narrowly tailored to affect only those businesses known to <br />produce unwanted secondary effects. The town failed to show how selling <br />small amounts of adult material fi:om the back of a clothing store posed a sign/fi- <br />cant risk of causing harm~l secondary effects, such as increased crime, low- <br />ered property values, and law enforcement issues. <br /> To show that the ordinance was narrowly tailored, the town had to produce <br />sufficient evidence Giggles' business would cause harmful secondary effects. <br />While the town presented several studies Showing the harmful secondary ef- <br />fects of adult businesses in other municipalities, it still had to show specifically <br />that Giggles' business posed a rSsk of causing the same type Of harm. <br /> 'Ultimately, the town was not entitled to ,judgment on the matter because it <br />was unclear how the teared harmful secondary effects were likely to be caused <br />by the small amounts of adult products Giggles planned to sell. <br />see also: Ci~, of Erie ,z Pap's A.M.. 529 U.S. 277, 120 S. Ct. ]382, ~ 46 £.Ed. 2d <br />265 (20O0). <br />xee alxo: Cir,, qfLos Angeles v. ,4&.meda Books, 535 L,~.S. 425, 122 S.C~. ~728, <br />152 L. Sd. 2d dF0 i2002). <br /> <br />Accessory Use ~ Campground also hosts music festivals <br />Sells rickets to members Of the general public as well tis campers <br />City, lion: :Pli~'/,'ime,,? ?.' 3ibe~: .4?pe/l~re C::tu'r ,~f' C,)n. nec'ric'~tr, ,.Va. AC 22879 <br /> <br />· ~: .~()C,& }Lllll!.':.i~ :'zOIISRIB~, _-'~OIID. -IlV ¢,I)IO(I[ICBOR 'S 3rOlllblte(I..--or 'nora nforrna~lon 31ease ;all :6i7', 542-0048. <br /> <br /> <br />