Laserfiche WebLink
Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor!Pro Tern' Zimmerman, Councilmembers Elvig, Cook, <br />Kurak, and Pearson. Voting No: NOne. Absent: Mayor Gamec and Councilmember <br />Strommen. <br /> <br />Case #6: Adopt Resolution AuthOrizing the Sale of Lot 1, Block 1, Business Park 95 <br /> Second Addition, Anokh COunty, Minnesota <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich reviewed that ~e Council adopts.ed an ordinance on October 26, 2004 <br />to authorize the sale of Lot 1, Block .1, Business Addition, to Zero Zone <br />Refrigeration, LLC. He explained the !county be adopted as well to <br />complete the sale of this property. ~ <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Kurak, seconded <br />04-12-386 authorizing the sale of Lot 1, <br /> <br />No. <br /> <br />Further discussion: Councilmember Elvig <br />requesting this resolution. City Attomey <br />ordinance, which is conclusive. The couhty Wants <br /> <br /> the county <br />City Council adopted the <br /> registered property. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor <br />Elvig, and Pearson. Voting No:: <br />Strommen. <br /> <br /> Kurak, Cook, <br />Ga~ec and COuncilmember <br /> <br />Case #7: <br /> <br />Introduce Ord: <br />City Code; C-' <br /> <br />(Performance Standards) of <br /> <br /> Community <br /> an increase in the <br /> new subdivisions; <br /> structures.:~:. <br /> establish.:: <br /> offices, 'She <br /> model homes, tern <br />/,:Withii~ the project Site, <br /> reqmrements. The <br /> recommending ,that model. <br /> <br />the last year, the City has experienced <br />sales offices and construction offices being located in <br />standards in City Code for these types of <br />is bringing forward proposed language to <br />sales offices, and construction trailers/field <br />would establish minimum standards for <br />and conStruction trailers/field offices, including location <br />of time permitted on the site, and minimum parking <br />}fficial has reviewed the proposed amendments and is <br />arid temPorary sales offices go through the building permit <br /> <br />process;, because.they :t bY the general public. The Planning Commission held a <br />public hearingiand no. pub!ii be~n received on the proposed ordinance. <br /> <br />Councihnember Eibi:~?is/iggested language be included t° allow another review if these <br />buildings become a P~oionged situation. He explained his concern is of a developer keeping a <br />trailer located in a development with one home as a model. At some point in time he would <br />think the residents would want to shut that down. <br /> <br />City Council/December 14, 2004 <br /> Page 20 of 33 <br /> <br /> <br />