My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Parks and Recreation Commission - 11/09/2017
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
2017
>
Minutes - Parks and Recreation Commission - 11/09/2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2025 9:40:17 AM
Creation date
1/25/2018 8:23:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
11/09/2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the rationale behind gradual increasing the fees.Also factoring into the increase is the <br />construction increases of all infrastructure improvements. <br /> <br />Chair Bennett noted the Commission has discussed this in the past. He noted the City has been <br />pretty market competitive in terms of the fees. He asked whether the staff has surveyed <br />neighboring cities. <br /> <br />Mr. Riverblood <br />the City does tend to be in the middle or a little lower. The exception is some <br />cities do not have stand-alone trail fees. The fact that the City has so many subdivisions before <br />the Commission is a testimony to the park fees not being a detriment to responsible and <br />reasonable growth. Developers are looking at Ramsey because of the developing park and trail <br />system. That is also borne out when looking at Parkview, next to the Amphitheater. Another <br />new apartment system being built is called Greenway Terrace, and that location has been chosen <br />because of the Greenway approved by the Park and Rec Commission and the City Council. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sis asked whether the increased fees will be adequate enough to meet the <br />demands for trails and amenities. He also inquired whether there is a potential appetite to be <br />more aggressive with the fee increase. <br /> <br />Mr. Riverblood responded the answer is no, the increases proposed will adequately meet some of <br />the pent-up demand for trails and amenities. The response to the second question is a policy <br />matter for the City Council that takes input on all the issues and sentiment of the community. <br />How to position Ramsey on development fees falls more in the purview of Council. They are an <br />-setting policy is in <br />plan will provide better guidance for this question as staff <br />looks at future needs and attempts to cost out long-term needs and maintenance demands and <br />costs. That is another question as it relates to property taxes, because that funds maintenance. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sis asked what governing body came up with the actual percentage increase as <br />recommended by staff. <br /> <br />Mr. Riverblood <br />City Council will then look at the rates and charges across the City at a work session on <br />thth <br />November 14. Then on November 24, there will be a public hearing, where comment will be <br />provided on the rate and fee structure. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sis asked what the Park and Rec Commission is being asked to recommend or <br />approve tonight. <br /> <br />Mr. Riverblood responded that this is the time, the Park and Rec Commission should make either <br />general recommendations to the City Council for park and trail fees rates and the cash <br />contributions, or a combination whereby the Commission recommends certain fee rates with a <br />part 2 with a suggestion to the Council look at the fee rates. It would be appropriate to have a <br />more specific recommendation, considering Council will be looking at rates, charges and <br />th <br />development fees on November 14. <br />Park and Recreation Commission/November 9, 2017 <br />Page 10 of 12 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.