My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Public Works Committee - 11/21/2017
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Public Works Committee
>
2010 - 2019
>
2017
>
Minutes - Public Works Committee - 11/21/2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 3:19:27 PM
Creation date
1/25/2018 8:45:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
11/21/2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Engineer Westby explained a Maintenance Expenditure Report must be completed by a <br />lump sum request is greater than 25% of its total allocation. If a city requests more than 25% as <br />maintenance allocation, a Maintenance Expenditure Report must be completed and filed each <br />year. He stated this report takes about 30 hours of staff time to create and in the end, it provides <br />no benefit. <br /> <br />City Engineer Westby stated in 2007, Ramsey requested its maintenance allocation be increased <br />to 35% and to avoid the need to complete expenditure reports each year, staff would like to <br />maintenance allocation for 2018 to roughly $300,000, which would not have a negative impact <br />on its street maintenance program. It was noted that each year, $140,000 of the total allocation is <br />transferred from the State Aid account to the General Fund to cover street maintenance activities, <br />which is well below $300,000. If approved, he would have to submit a request to reduce the <br />allocation to 25% along with a City Council resolution. <br /> <br />Chairperson Riley asked why the percentage had been changed in the past. <br /> <br />City Engineer Westby stated in the past there were some funding issues and the City was not <br />receiving enough funds for street maintenance so it was bumped to 35% to allocate more funds <br />to maintenance. <br /> <br />Chairperson Riley asked staff to assure, when presenting to City Council, it is clearly explained <br />so it does not appear to reduce funding towards maintenance. <br /> <br />Councilmember Johns stated it does not prohibit the City from having 26% or 27% in <br />maintenance costs. <br /> <br />City Engineer Westby stated that is correct, noting the same allocation will be received. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Shryock, seconded by Councilmember Johns, to recommend that the <br />City Council 5% to <br />25%. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Riley, Councilmembers Shryock and Johns. Voting <br />No: None. <br /> <br />5.07: Consider the Addition of Street Lights in our Industrial Area <br /> <br />Public Works Superintendent Riemer presented the staff report and explained the purpose of this <br />explained staff received a complaint from a local business owner about vandalism who felt part <br />of the cause was lack of adequate street lighting near his business. Staff inventoried street <br />lighting in the industrial area and found it could be improved at several key intersections. <br /> <br />Public Works Committee / November 21, 2017 <br />Page 12 of 16 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.