My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 01/04/2018
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2018
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 01/04/2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:29:58 AM
Creation date
1/25/2018 9:11:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
01/04/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
231
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Zoning Bulletin December 10, 2017 I Volume 11 I Issue 23 <br />special permit." The court further explained that if the imposed conditions are <br />"unreasonable or improper," they may be annulled although the variance is <br />upheld. <br />Here, the appellate court concluded that the ZBA's conditions on Bonefish <br />Grill's parking variance, requiring valet parking and limiting the hours of <br />operation to coincide with the hours of access to the 40 off-street parking <br />spaces granted in the license agreement, were "proper because the conditions <br />related directly to the use of the land and were intended to protect the neighbor- <br />ing commercial properties from the potential adverse effects of [Bonefish <br />Grill's] operation, such as the anticipated increase in traffic congestion and <br />parking problems." The court found that the "ZBA's rationale was supported <br />by empirical and testimonial evidence," including the testimony of local store <br />owners and the ZBA members own personal knowledge of parking demands <br />in the area of the Property. <br />See also: St. Onge v. Donovan, 71 N.Y.2d507, 527 N.Y.S.2d 721, 522N.E.2d <br />1019 (1988). <br />See also: Martin v. Brookhaven Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 34 A.D.3d 811, 825 <br />N.Y.S.2d 244 (2d Dep't 2006). <br />Zoning News from Around the <br />Nation <br />CALIFORNIA <br />The San Francisco Board of Supervisors in considering legislation "that <br />would make it easier to establish specially protected cultural districts in the <br />city." The bill's aim is to "help slow the tide of gentrification in traditional <br />ethnic enclaves." The new bill defines a cultural district as a neighborhood <br />that: "Embodies a unique cultural heritage because it contains a concentration <br />of cultural and historic assets or culturally significant enterprise, arts, services, <br />or businesses, or because a significant portion of its residents or people who <br />spend time in the area or location are members of a specific cultural, com- <br />munity, or ethnic group." <br />Source: Curbed San Francisco; https://sfcurbed.com <br />MARYLAND <br />The Montgomery County Council passed legislation that restricts the place- <br />ment of country inns in certain residential zones. While current zoning law <br />designates "ruralareas" as locations for country inns, the recently passed mea- <br />sure gives more specificity, allowing for a country inn to be located in certain <br />residential zones "only on properties that border a more rural zone." An <br />amendment to the bill creates an exemption to the location restrictions for <br />country inns located in a building that the county has deemed historic. <br />Source: Bethesda Magazine; www.bethesdarnagazine.com <br />© 2017 Thomson Reuters 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.