Laserfiche WebLink
Presentation <br />Community Development Director Gladhill presented the Staff Report stating Shade Tree <br />Communities has contacted the City and expressed a desire to resubmit a proposed plat known as <br />Shade Tree Cottages. This is a project that went through City review approximately ten (10) years <br />ago and received final plat and site plan approval as well as a zoning amendment to rezone the <br />parcel to Planned Unit Development (PUD). The project is a mix of small -lot single-family and <br />detached townhomes (villas/detached single-family with HOA maintenance). Staff reviewed the <br />proposed plan and requested feedback from the Commission. <br />Commission Business <br />Commissioner Brauer requested further information on Potassium Street. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill commented on the Potassium Street easements and <br />the gravel cul-de-sac. He explained the developer would have to bring the infrastructure at his <br />own cost. He anticipated the developer would approach the City for a cost -share plan. He stated <br />there was no intention to spread these costs out with the existing neighborhood. He provided <br />further comment on the public benefit from turning this roadway from gravel to asphalt. <br />Commissioner VanScoy asked if Potassium Street was a public roadway. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill reported this was the case. He discussed the other <br />roadways within the development and noted one street would be private. <br />Commissioner VanScoy questioned if the City' s cul-de-sac standards would apply to a private <br />roadway. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill reported the City would still have some discretion and <br />the City's fire apparatus would still have to be able to maneuver this area. <br />Commissioner VanScoy asked if there was anything else the Commission could do to address the <br />wetland setbacks. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill stated because this property was zoned PUD, the <br />wetland setbacks would not have to be followed. <br />Commissioner VanScoy indicated he did not care for this project the first time he saw it and did <br />not support it today either. He stated he had great concerns with the wetland setbacks. He inquired <br />what the proposed density was for this project. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill estimated the density would be 4 to 7 units per acre, <br />which was more of a medium density residential concept. <br />Planning Commission/December 7, 2017 <br />Page 7 of 13 <br />