Laserfiche WebLink
January 10, 2018 I Volume 12 I Issue 1 Zoning Bulletin <br />See also: Dal Maso v. Board of County Com'rs of Prince George's <br />County, 182 Md. 200, 34 A.2d 464 (1943). <br />See also: State v. Fisher; 204 Md. 307, 104 A.2d 403 (1954). <br />Case Note: <br />Another party -Queen Anne's Conservation Association —also joined the <br />County's appeals. <br />Case Note: <br />Notably, here there was no contention that Waterman or the Town had taken <br />any action reliant on the County resolution approving the rezoning during the <br />two -week interval before the new Board of County Commissioners rescinded <br />it. <br />Case Note: <br />In its decision, the court noted that the general power of a governing body to <br />rescind a prior law or policy on a matter subject to its jurisdiction "may be <br />constrained in particular circumstances, as when a party has acquired a <br />vested right in the governing body's prior policy decision. " However, said the <br />court, "[a]bsent such circumstances, the governing body retains the option of <br />changing its mind," <br />Authority/Public and low-income <br />housing —Property owner asks <br />zoning board of appeals to waive <br />deed restrictions to allow for <br />residential use <br />Property owner and zoning board of appeals <br />dispute whether board has authority under <br />affordable housing law to waive deed restrictions <br />Citation: 135 Wells Avenue, LLC v. Housing Appeals Committee, 478 <br />Mass. 346, 84 N.E.3d 1257 (2017) <br />8 © 2018 Thomson Reuters <br />