Laserfiche WebLink
Motion by Commissioner Milless, seconded by Commissioner Deemer, to recommend that the <br />City Charter be amended by repeal of Chapter 14 "Metropolitan Urban Service Area"; that this <br />proposed amendment be referred to the City Council for it to establish a ballot question for this <br />purpose and that this amendment be submitted to the qualified voters for their <br />approval/disapproval at the November 2002 general election. <br /> <br />Further discussion: COmmissioner LaMere inquired if there was a way to inform the residents <br />that the problem was with the process, not the language. She also noted that six percent of the <br />Ramsey voters voted to adopt Chapter 14. City Administrator Norman recommended that the <br />motion be amended to include language on the ballot regarding the reason for the change. <br /> <br />Motion was amended to recommend that the City Council include language regarding the reason <br />for the change. <br /> <br />Further discussion: Commissioner Swanson inquired if there was a way for them to insure that <br />the process gets started to get the language included in Chapter 9 of City Code. City Attorney <br />Goodrich replied that that is not the Charter Commission area of concern. As citizens they could <br />attend the Council meeting and endorse any ordinance. Commissioner Deemer stated that the <br />City Council is in the process of placing the correct use into the City Code. He stated that Mr. <br />Hendriksen had three votes to pass the ordinance at one point in time and then the Charter was <br />amended to allow for three votes to pass, but then he no longer had the three votes. They are <br />now working on getting it passed in an acceptable form to everYone. Commissioner Ebel stated <br />that she did not feel there were enough Commission members present to vote on the issue before <br />them. Chairperson Vogt replied that they do'have a quorum. <br /> <br />Motion can'ied. Voting Yes: Chairperson Vogt, Commissioners Milless, Deemer, LaMere, and <br />Swanson. Voting No: Commissioners EbeE Absent: Commissioners Bertzyk and Henke. <br /> <br />Case #6: Consider City Manager Form of Government <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman stated that Commissioner Darlene Milless has requested tlfis item be <br />placed on the Commission's agenda, h~ reviewing past Charter Commission minutes, <br />Cmmnissioner Milless noted that the Charter Commission considered City Manager form of <br />Government during meetings held in 1998 and 1999. Colnmissioner Milless suggested the <br />Commission return to the consideration of the matter. When the Charter Commission discussed the <br />City Manager form of Government in 1998 and 1999, the item was proposed by then Commissioner <br />Susan Anderson. [t was reported by the City Admirfistrator in January 1999 that a survey of 21 <br />comparably sized cities based in the northwest quadrant of the metropolitan area found five cities <br />with administrator form of government and 16 cities with the City Manager form of Goven~nent, <br />An explanation was made to the Charter Commission in 1999 regarding the differences between a <br />City Administrator and City Managerl form of Government. Staff has provided a League of <br />Minnesota Cities research that provides a description of the differences as revised in August 2000. <br />Staff has attached the City Administrator and City Manger portion of the memorandum to this case. <br />A City Administrator position is not reqUired by State Statute, but has been created by ordinance or <br />resolution by the City. The history of the City Administrator position is less defined then the history <br />of either the City Clerk or Manager positions, h~ Minnesota, the position has apparently grown octt <br /> <br />Charter Commission/July 18, 2002 <br /> Page 17 of 22 <br /> <br />-67- <br /> <br /> <br />