Laserfiche WebLink
Community Development Director Gladhill commented the utilization of the area in the back <br />was a concern without paving the site. If motor vehicle sales could be conducted on the already <br />paved surface, this would not be a concern. <br />Vice Chairperson VanScoy questioned if a phased approach could be taken regarding the paving. <br />Mr. Evenson stated his main concern at this time was the expense. He appreciated how staff <br />approached this issue and commented he was still considering if this property would work for his <br />business. Further discussion ensued regarding the boat storage activity that was occurring on this <br />property currently. He explained he would be greatly improving the outdoor storage situation if <br />he were able to purchase the property. <br />Vice Chairperson VanScoy supported a phased approach for this property. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill commented staff was willing to work with the <br />applicant on a phased approach. <br />Vice Chairperson VanScoy asked if the applicant could support a phased approach. <br />Mr. Evenson stated he was uncertain at this time. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill suggested cost estimates be provided by City staff <br />and that negotiations be held between staff and the applicant. The Planning Commission <br />encouraged the applicant to work with staff. <br />Commissioner Surma anticipated that if the gravel area was paved the property value would be <br />greatly enhanced. <br />6.03: Discussion Item: Oversized Signage in the COR <br />Presentation <br />City Planner Brigl presented the Staff Report stating members of the City Council and public <br />wanted to visit the topic of over -sized signage in the COR to potentially develop City standards <br />in -line with the mission of the COR. It was noted this was a discussion topic only. <br />Commission Business <br />Commissioner Anderson stated he would need more context in order to provide staff with <br />feedback. He commented he could not support a 75-foot sign in the COR as this would be out of <br />place. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill reviewed a zoning map for the properties along <br />Highway 10. He requested feedback on the Commission' s level of comfort for sign height in this <br />particular area. He reported the common sign height request was 75 feet. <br />Planning Commission/February 1, 2018 <br />Page 12 of 14 <br />