Laserfiche WebLink
Municipal Revenue & Taxation <br />PERA Police and Fire Plan. Metro Cities also supports state assistance to local <br />governments to cover any additional contribution burdens placed on cities over and above <br />contribution increases required by employees. Cities should receive sufficient notice of <br />these increases so that they may take them into account for budgeting purposes. <br />Metro Cities opposes benefit improvements for active employees or retirees until the <br />financial health of the PERA General Plan and PERA Police and Fire Plan are <br />restored. <br />Metro Cities supports modifications to help align PERA contributions and costs, and <br />reduce the need for additional contribution increases, including a modification of <br />PERA eligibility guidelines to account for temporary, seasonal and part-time <br />employment situations, the use of pro -rated service credit and a comprehensive review <br />of exclusions to simplify eligibility guidelines. Further employer contribution rate <br />increases should be avoided until other cost alignment mechanisms are considered. <br />Metro Cities supports cities and fire relief associations working together to determine <br />the best application of State Fire Aid. Flexibility in the application of State Fire Aid, <br />where combination departments exist, will ensure that fire services can be provided in <br />the most cost effective means possible. <br />With regard to police pension contributions, Metro Cities supports a proactive review <br />of factors contributing to the financial status of police and fire pension plans, to ensure <br />that structural adjustments are considered in conjunction with potential increases in <br />employee and employer contribution rates. Specifically, an area that could be <br />considered is contractual overtime impacts on pension levels. <br />1-Q State Program Revenue Sources <br />Metro Cities opposes any attempt by the state to finance programs of statewide value <br />and significance that are traditionally funded with state revenues, with local revenue <br />sources such as municipal utilities or property tax mechanisms. Statewide programs serve <br />important state goals and objectives, and should be financed through traditional state revenue <br />sources such as the income or sales tax. <br />Metro Cities further opposes substituting traditionally state funded programs with <br />funding mechanisms that would disparately affect taxpayers in the metropolitan area. <br />1-R Post -Employment Benefits <br />Metro Cities supported statutory changes that allow local governments to establish trusts <br />from which to fund post -employment health and life insurance benefits for public <br />employees, with participation by cities on a strictly voluntary basis, in recognition that <br />cities have differing local needs and circumstances. Cities should also retain the ability to <br />determine the level of post -employment benefits to be provided to employees. <br />2018 Legislative Policies <br />7 <br />