Laserfiche WebLink
General Government <br />clustering, and supports enforcement of these rules by the appropriate county agencies. <br />2-1 Annexation <br />Attempts have been made in recent years to reduce tensions between cities and townships <br />around annexations. A Municipal Boundary Adjustment Task Force, whose work was <br />published in 2009, worked to develop recommendations regarding best practices annexation <br />training for city and township officials to better communicate and jointly plan potential <br />annexations. While the task force could define the differences between cities and townships on <br />the issue of annexation, no significant advancements were made in creating best practices. <br />Metro Cities supports continued legislative efforts to develop recommendations <br />regarding best practices annexation training for city and township officials to better <br />communicate and jointly plan potential annexations. Further, Metro Cities supports <br />substantive changes to the state's annexation laws that will lead to better land use <br />planning, energy conservation, greater environmental protection, fairer tax bases, <br />clarification of fee reimbursement and fewer conflicts between townships and cities. <br />Metro Cities also supports technical annexation changes that have been agreed to by <br />cities and townships. <br />2-J Statewide Funding Sources for Local Issues with Regional Impact <br />Many issues including, but not limited to, the implementation of a metropolitan area <br />groundwater monitoring network, emerald ash borer management and the cleanup of storm - <br />water retention ponds, come with significant local costs, and have impacts that reach beyond <br />municipal boundaries. <br />Metro Cities supports the availability of statewide funding sources to address local <br />issues that have regional or statewide significance or are caused by state or regional <br />actions. <br />Metro Cities opposes the requirement of enacting ordinances more restrictive than state <br />law in exchange for access to these funds. <br />2-K Urban Forest Management Funding <br />Urban forests are an essential part of city infrastructure. Dutch elm disease, oak wilt disease, <br />drought, storms, and emerald ash borer threaten public investments in trees. The costs for <br />controlling these issues can be greatly consequential for city budgets. The Minnesota <br />Department of Natural Resources, through its Urban and Community Forestry program, and <br />the Minnesota Department of Agriculture, through its Shade Tree and Invasive Species <br />program, currently have regulatory authority to direct tree sanitation and control programs. <br />Although these programs allow for addressing some tree disease, pest, and other problems, <br />funding levels have been inadequate to meet the need of cities to build capacity for urban tree <br />programs and respond to catastrophic problems. <br />2018 Legislative Policies <br />14 <br />