Laserfiche WebLink
Housing & Economic Development <br />unless a local community chooses to do so; <br />• Allow TIF eligibility expansion to innovative technological products, recognizing that <br />not only physical items create economic value; <br />• Support changes to TIF law that will facilitate the development of "regional projects"; <br />• Shift TIF redevelopment policy away from a focus on "blight" and "substandard" to <br />"functionally obsolete" or a focus on long range planning for a particular community, <br />reduction in greenhouse gases or other criteria more relevant to current needs; <br />• Encourage DEED to do an extensive cost -benefit analysis related to redevelopment, <br />including an analysis of the various funding mechanisms, and an analysis of where the cost <br />burden falls with each of the options compared to the distribution of the benefits of the <br />redevelopment project; <br />• Support TIF for neighborhood recovery efforts in the wake of the foreclosure crisis; <br />• Consider creating an inter -disciplinary TIF team to review local exception TIF <br />proposals, using established criteria, and make recommendations to the legislature on their <br />passage; <br />• Encourage the State Auditor to continue to work toward a more efficient and <br />streamlined reporting process. There are an increasing number of noncompliance notices <br />that have overturned longstanding practices or limited statutorily defined terms. The <br />Legislature has not granted TIF rulemaking authority to the State Auditor and the audit <br />powers granted by statute are not an appropriate vehicle for making administrative or <br />legislative changes to TIF statutes. If the State Auditor is to exercise rulemaking authority, <br />the administrative power to do so must be granted explicitly by the Legislature. The audit <br />enforcement process does not create a level playing field for cities to challenge the <br />Auditor's interpretation of statutes. The Legislature should provide a process through <br />which to resolve disputes over TIF policy that is fair to all parties; <br />• Clarify the use of TIF when a sale occurs after the closing of a district; <br />• Revise substandard building test to simplify, resolve ambiguities and reduce continued <br />threat of litigation; and <br />• Amend TIF statute to address, through extending districts or other mechanisms, <br />shortfalls related to declining market values during economic crises. <br />3-M Eminent Domain <br />Significant statutory restrictions on the use of eminent domain have resulted in higher public <br />costs for traditional public use projects like streets, parks, and sewers, and have all but restricted <br />the use of eminent domain for redevelopment to cases of extreme blight or contamination. <br />2018 Legislative Policies <br />31 <br />