Laserfiche WebLink
Metropolitan Agencies <br />In order to accommodate this growth in a manner that preserves the region's high quality <br />of life: <br />• Natural resource protection will have to be balanced with growth and <br />development/reinvestment; <br />• Significant new resources will have to be provided for transportation and transit; and <br />• New households will have to be incorporated into the core cities, first and second -ring <br />suburbs, and developing cities through both development and redevelopment. <br />In order for regional and local planning to result in the successful implementation of <br />regional policies: <br />• The State of Minnesota must contribute additional financial resources, particularly in the <br />areas of transportation and transit, community reinvestment, affordable housing development, <br />and the preservation of parks and open space. If funding for regional infrastructure is not <br />adequate, cities should not be responsible for meeting the growth forecast set forth by the <br />Metropolitan Council; <br />• The Metropolitan Council and Legislature must work to pursue levels of state and federal <br />transportation funding that are adequate to meet identified transportation and transit needs in the <br />metropolitan area; <br />• The Metropolitan Council must recognize the limitations of its authority and continue to <br />work with cities in a collaborative, incentives -based manner; <br />• The Metropolitan Council must recognize the various needs and capacities of its many <br />partners, including but not limited to cities, counties, economic development authorities and <br />nonprofit organizations, and its policies must be balanced and flexible in their approach; and <br />• Metropolitan counties, adjacent counties and school districts must be brought more <br />thoroughly into the discussion due to the critical importance of facilities and services such as <br />county roads and public schools in accommodating forecasted growth. <br />• Metro Cities opposes statutory or other regulatory changes that interfere with <br />established regional and local processes to manage growth in the metropolitan region, <br />including regional systems plans, systems statements, and local comprehensive plans. Such <br />changes erode local planning authority as well as the efficient provision of regional <br />infrastructure, disregard established public processes, and create different guidelines for <br />communities that may result in financial, environmental and other impacts on surrounding <br />communities. <br />• Greater recognition must be given to the fact that the "true" metropolitan region extends <br />beyond the traditional seven -county area and the need to work collaboratively with adjacent <br />counties in Minnesota and Wisconsin, and the cities within those counties. The region faces <br />2018 Legislative Policies <br />43 <br />