My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 02/27/2018
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2018
>
Minutes - Council - 02/27/2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 12:42:34 PM
Creation date
3/9/2018 2:41:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/27/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. James replied that rents would begin at $1,400 and would run up to $2,200 noting that rents <br /> would be all inclusive of utilities with the exception of telephone. <br /> Motion by Councilmember Riley, seconded by Councilmember Kuzma, to Adopt Resolution <br /> #18-032 Granting Preliminary Plat Approval for Affinity at Ramsey and Resolution #18-033 <br /> Granting Site Plan Approval for Affinity at Ramsey. <br /> Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Strommen, Councilmembers Riley, Kuzma, Johns, <br /> LeTourneau, and Shryock. Voting No: None. <br /> 7.03: Consider Adopting Resolution #18-049 Authorizing Civil Engineering Planning <br /> Services from Bolton & Menk for Highway 10 Planning Effort <br /> Community Development Director Gladhill reviewed the staff report and recommendation to <br /> proceed forward with the Work Order. He noted that Bolton & Menk was the engineer for the <br /> Highway 10 Access Planning Study and therefore there are a number of efficiencies of this firm <br /> proceeding forward with the work as opposed to bringing in a new firm. He noted that the <br /> Public Works Committee recommended approval of the Work Order, contingent upon ensuring <br /> that these efforts did not conflict with the priorities or efforts of the Greater Minnesota Gateway <br /> Coalition, which prioritizes all Highway 10 projects. He advised that staff has confirmed that <br /> said coalition is generally supportive of this effort. <br /> Eric Johnson, Bolton & Menk, stated that the approach of the Highway 10 Access Planning <br /> Study left a lot of options open. He stated that while the approach is valid, this study will <br /> establish a clean singular vision to resolve uncertainty in the corridor. He commented that the <br /> rail grade separations should be included in this study as well. He stated that there needs to be <br /> flexibility built into the vision and advised that can be done in many pieces. He noted that there <br /> has been a state of flux for stakeholder along the corridor and this study will help to answer a lot <br /> of their questions and encourage reinvestment in the properties. He stated that Anoka is close to <br /> having funding in place to remove the signals at Fairoak and Thurston, which will push that <br /> congestion into Ramsey at Sunfish Lake Boulevard. <br /> Angie Bersaw, Bolton & Menk, stated that they will be building off the Highway 10 Access <br /> Planning Study. She stated that phase one is still in the planning phase and this would narrow <br /> down the single option. She explained that phase two would begin designing that concept and <br /> noted that phase two is not included in the work order tonight. She provided additional details <br /> on the approach and how this would differ from the Highway 10 Access Planning Study noting <br /> that this phase would provide the right sized solution, align priorities, identify key components <br /> and footprints, and find the best combination to meet the goals in order to find a vision that can <br /> be supported by all. She stated that the second phase would focus on creating a roadmap to <br /> construction and identifying a plan to gain funding. She provided additional details on the <br /> stakeholder engagement process. She reviewed the proposed schedule for phase one and the <br /> future phase two, noting that phase two is not being requested tonight and could include funding <br /> partners. <br /> Councilmember Kuzma asked for details on specific details that would be included in phase two. <br /> City Council/February 27,2018 <br /> Page 5of10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.