Laserfiche WebLink
Asst. City Administrator/Economic Development Manager Brama replied that it was his belief <br /> that the determination was made to only include that question on the 2014 survey. He noted that <br /> he could include the question again but would need to drop another question to make room. <br /> Mayor Strommen agreed that residents may respond differently if they have been assessed. She <br /> noted that you may not receive a fair response as not all residents have been assessed. She <br /> believed that it is an important question to continue to ask as the climate may change. <br /> Councilmember Shryock referenced question 11 and asked if State or County should be included <br /> rather than jumping directly to Federal government. <br /> Asst. City Administrator/Economic Development Manager Brama stated that this is standard <br /> language in the survey but believed that the additional language could be added. <br /> Councilmember Johns stated that while it may be good to add the language, people may not <br /> distinguish the difference. <br /> Mayor Strommen agreed that it would make sense to add the additional language. <br /> Councilmember LeTourneau stated that perhaps that question could be removed in general. He <br /> stated that there really is not good information gained from the response. <br /> Mayor Strommen provided additional details, noting that sometimes those types of questions <br /> distinguish the level of trust that people have for different levels of government. She stated that <br /> if the intent is to rate the level of City services, that could simply be asked. <br /> Councilmember LeTourneau stated that the question is not objective, and he is not sure as to the <br /> value that is added from that question. <br /> Councilmember Johns noted that value type questions are asked throughout the survey and <br /> agreed that perhaps this question is not necessary. <br /> Asst. City Administrator/Economic Development Manager Brama stated that this item is not <br /> time sensitive and advised that he can go back to the survey company to gain additional <br /> information on the meaning of this question. He noted that after review, the road funding <br /> question was asked in 2014 and 2016 and therefore it would make sense to continue asking that <br /> question in order to gain trending data. He stated that staff will make amendments to the survey <br /> and will bring the item back to the Council in a future work session. <br /> Councilmember Kuzma asked if the cost is lower because the City has gone through the process <br /> before or whether the cost has increased. <br /> Asst. City Administrator/Economic Development Manager Brama replied that the cost remains <br /> stable with slight increase for inflation. He stated that $13,000 was budgeted for this item and <br /> $3,500 is received in outside funding from the State. He estimated that the cost would be about <br /> $15,000 but noted that he can obtain more accurate information. <br /> City Council Work Session/February 27, 2018 <br /> Page3of6 <br />