Laserfiche WebLink
Community Development Director Gladhill commented the utilization of the area in the back <br /> was a concern without paving the site. If motor vehicle sales could be conducted on the already <br /> paved surface, this would not be a concern. <br /> Vice Chairperson VanScoy questioned if a phased approach could be taken regarding the paving. <br /> Mr. Evenson stated his main concern at this time was the expense. He appreciated how staff <br /> approached this issue and commented he was still considering if this property would work for his <br /> business. Further discussion ensued regarding the boat storage activity that was occurring on this <br /> property currently. He explained he would be greatly improving the outdoor storage situation if <br /> he were able to purchase the property. <br /> Vice Chairperson VanScoy supported a phased approach for this property. <br /> Community Development Director Gladhill commented staff was willing to work with the <br /> applicant on a phased approach. <br /> Vice Chairperson VanScoy asked if the applicant could support a phased approach. <br /> Mr. Evenson stated he was uncertain at this time. <br /> Community Development Director Gladhill suggested cost estimates be provided by City staff <br /> and that negotiations be held between staff and the applicant. The Planning Commission <br /> encouraged the applicant to work with staff. <br /> Commissioner Surma anticipated that if the gravel area was paved the property value would be <br /> greatly enhanced. <br /> 6.03: Discussion Item: Oversized Signage in the COR <br /> Presentation <br /> City Planner Brigl presented the Staff Report stating members of the City Council and public <br /> wanted to visit the topic of over-sized signage in the COR to potentially develop City standards <br /> in-line with the mission of the COR. It was noted this was a discussion topic only. <br /> Commission Business <br /> 1 <br /> Commissioner Anderson stated he would need more context in order to provide staff with <br /> feedback. He commented he could not support a 75-foot sign in the COR as this would be out of <br /> place. <br /> • <br /> Community Development Director Gladhill reviewed a zoning map for the properties along <br /> Highway 10. He requested feedback on the Commission's level of comfort for sign height in this <br /> particular area. He reported the common sign height request was 75 feet. <br /> Planning Commission/February 1,2018 <br /> Page 12 of 14 <br />