Laserfiche WebLink
Maria Gobernath, 5880 177th Avenue NW, stated she has the youngest child on the block, age <br /> four. She noted Travis Longfield has two young children. She expressed concern with letting <br /> her son play at the Longfield property given number of large vehicles coming and going from the <br /> property. She feared the roadway would prematurely need repairs given the high volume of <br /> commercial trucks. She explained she didn't have a problem with Travis or his family, but stated <br /> she did have concerns with the business operations. <br /> Rob Shaneus, Attorney for Travis Longfield, addressed the Commission. He described how the <br /> neighborhood was structured and the lots were oriented. He reported the neighboring property <br /> was a working farm and had much of the same traffic the neighbors were concerned about. <br /> However, because this property was zoned agricultural, the traffic was allowed. He stated his <br /> client had no intention of parking trucks on the street long-term. He noted this was a short-term <br /> situation during construction on the property. He commented on his client's intention to store all <br /> company vehicles within an accessory structure which would be built on his property. He stated <br /> his client received a letter from the City identifying two options to bring the property into <br /> compliance and explained his client had chosen to build an accessory structure. <br /> Mr. Longfield stated it was not his intention to drive recklessly down his street and explained he <br /> was unaware of any beer can throwing incident. He indicated he was not trying to make anybody <br /> mad. He noted he has allowed to have a fire on his property and explained he had all the <br /> necessary permits in place. <br /> Commissioner Gengler asked if all employees would be living onsite during the 2018 <br /> landscaping season. <br /> Mr. Longfield stated his plan was to have his employees staying on his property. <br /> Vice Chairperson VanScoy commented traffic was a concern for him. He noted the applicant <br /> was allowed eight trips per day without becoming excessive. He understood that only six trips <br /> were being generated at this time. He encouraged employees to carpool into and out of the site in <br /> order to reduce the traffic to the property. <br /> Community Development Director Gladhill recommended that the applicant pursue a home <br /> occupation through the conditional use permit process and that this not be approved by staff <br /> administratively given the complexity of the request and location of the employees. He <br /> anticipated the request would require conditions. <br /> Vice Chairperson VanScoy and the entire Planning Commission supported this recommendation. <br /> Mr. Shaneus expressed concern that a conditional use permit was being proposed when home <br /> occupations are entitled if an applicant complies with a list of conditions. He stated applicants <br /> have three options with home occupations, one being staff can approve home occupations <br /> administratively with conditions. He reported that only if an applicant does not comply with <br /> these conditions, is a conditional use permit required. He explained that his client has made <br /> every effort to comply with City Ordinance. He stated if Mr. Longfield installs a garage and <br /> Planning Commission/February 1, 2018 <br /> Page 9 of 14 <br />