Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City of Ramsey February 12, 2007 <br />Functional Assessment of Wetlands <br />quality, which is critical to wetland sustainability. These wetlands would likely <br />benefit from active management. <br />Wetlands with a medium vegetative diversity/integrity rating andahigh rating for <br />Manage 1 <br />hydrologic regime were placed in the category. The vegetative <br />community in these wetlands has only been moderately affected by humans and still <br />maintains high functioning levels for hydrologic regime, which is critical to wetland <br />sustainability. These wetlands would likely benefit from active management. <br />Wetlands rated high for commercial use. These wetlands provide important social <br />value without having an altered hydrology. <br />Manage 2 <br />Wetlands placed in the Management Classification have at least one of the <br />following characteristics: <br />Wetlands rated with medium vegetative diversity/integrity, which typically include <br />wetlands with less diversity and up to 50 percent cover of non-native or invasive <br />species. <br />Wetlands rated as medium for wildlife habitat. These often include wetlands that are <br />increasingly separated from natural communities and wildlife corridors; they often <br />lack significant upland buffers and are increasingly altered. <br />Wetlands rated as low for amphibian habitat. These wetlands are increasingly altered, <br />but they still have some opportunity to provide either breeding, over wintering, or <br />resting habitat for amphibians. <br />Wetlands rated as medium for fish habitat. These wetlands include those which are <br />intermittently connected to waterbodies supporting native fish populations <br />Wetlands rated low for shoreline protection. While these wetlands are not providing <br />the highest level of protection to the lake or river systems, their mere presence <br />provides some level of protection that should not be dismissed. These wetlands are <br />typically narrow, with little emergent, submergent, or floating-leaved vegetation. <br />Wetlands rated medium for aesthetics/education/recreation/cultural and low for <br />wildlife habitat. <br />Manage 3 <br />Wetlands placed in the Management Classification have at least one of the <br />following characteristics: <br />Remaining wetlands that did not fit into any of the above-described conditions. <br />Wetlands rated low for vegetative diversity/integrity. <br />Wetlands rated medium or high for downstream water quality protection and for flood <br />storage/attenuation. This correlation is expected since wetlands that provide higher <br />levels of water quality treatment and runoff/rate control often suffer from ecological <br />degradation. <br />6 <br /> <br />