My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
05/08/17
>
Comprehensive Plan
>
2040 Steering Committee
>
Agendas
>
05/08/17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2018 9:42:41 AM
Creation date
3/13/2018 9:42:18 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
237
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />City of Ramsey February 12, 2007 <br />Functional Assessment of Wetlands <br />WETLAND FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS <br />A total of 349 NWI/MMCD wetlands were inventoried within the City of Ramsey and of <br />these, 136 wetlands were verified in the field. Data collected during the field assessment <br />indicated that of the 136 wetlands: <br />122 were wetlands of Circular 39 Types 1 through 8, <br />8 were riverine wetlands, and <br />6 proved to be non-wetland areas <br />The distribution of the 136 field verified wetlands and associated wetland types, is shown <br />in Exhibit 3. <br />In order to assess the number and types of wetlands within the City, wetlands were <br />grouped by type according to the Circular 39 methodology and the Cowardin <br />methodology for riverine wetlands since Circular 39 does not provide a type for riverine. <br />Table 2 gives a summary of the wetlands by type, number, and acreage for single and <br />multiple type wetlands. In general, wetlands that had a single Type 2, 3, and 4 <br />classifications were more common than wetlands that had a Type 1, 5, 6, or 7 <br />classification. No wetlands of Type 8 – Bog were inventoried within the City. Wetland <br />complexes with the Type Riverine were the large wetland complexes associated with the <br />Mississippi and Rum River. <br />Function and Value Assessment <br />The results of the MnRAM 3.0 assessment are summarized in Table 3. Exhibits 4 <br />through 15 show the functional ratings for the following MnRAM 3.0 wetland functions: <br />Vegetative Diversity/Integrity; Wildlife Habitat; Amphibian Habitat; Fish Habitat; <br />Shoreline Protection; Aesthetic, Recreation, Education; Wetland Stormwater Sensitivity; <br />Stormwater Treatment Needs; Hydrologic Regime; Flood Storage; Downstream Water <br />Quality; and Wetland Water Quality. Based on the assessment, the functional assessment <br />rating of exceptional was assigned to: 1) nine wetlands for Vegetative Diversity/ <br />Integrity, 2) six wetlands for Wildlife Habitat, 3) 15 wetlands for Aesthetics, Recreation, <br />and Education, 4) 17 wetlands for Wetland Stormwater Sensitivity, 5) four wetlands for <br />Stormwater Treatment Needs, and 6) four for Wetland Water Quality . None of the <br />wetlands in the City of Ramsey were found to be used for commercial purposes. <br />As part of the inventory, wetlands offering potential wetland restoration were identified. <br />Twelve wetlands were identified as having wetland restoration potential. This report <br />does not include a detailed investigation as to the feasibility of restoration or how such <br />restoration might be designed for each of these wetlands. Additional investigation would <br />be required to further analyze the feasibility of restoring wetlands. <br />Information on each of the wetlands is also included in the inventory made available <br />within the MnRAM 3.0 database. See Appendix C for the Wetland Functional <br />Assessment for the field verified wetlands. <br />11 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.