Laserfiche WebLink
CC Work Session 2. 3. <br />Meeting Date: 03/13/2018 <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Review Construction Manager Option for Public Works Campus <br />Purpose/Background: <br />City staff is exploring the option of securing a construction manager firm to manage the proposed public works <br />facility project, currently within the City's Capital Improvement Plan. The reason to consider the construction <br />manager approach at this point is to get assistance early in the project to reduce costs and to value -engineer the <br />design of this multi -million dollar facility. Two primary alternatives include a Construction manager Advisor role <br />where the City holds the contracts, or a Construction Manager At -risk role, where all the contracts are assigned to <br />the construction manager firm. Staff has consulted with several jurisdictions in the area that have recently used this <br />approach for the construction of similar scale new public facilities (e.g. Andover, Elk River, Fridley, Maple Grove, <br />Washington County) and they highly recommend the process for this scale of project. <br />The purpose of this case is to introduce the concept of construction management, the two methods, and to discuss <br />the advantages and disadvantages of each. A construction management firm has been invited to attend. <br />Timeframe: <br />Funding Source: <br />NA <br />Responsible Party(ies): <br />Outcome: <br />Foe discussion only. <br />Attachments <br />RJM Construction Management <br />RJM Community Market <br />RJM Company Overview <br />Form Review <br />Inbox Reviewed By Date <br />Kurt Ulrich Kurt Ulrich 03/08/2018 05:05 PM <br />Form Started By: Jo Thieling Started On: 03/08/2018 04:28 PM <br />Final Approval Date: 03/08/2018 <br />