My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 11/26/2002
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2002
>
Minutes - Council - 11/26/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 12:11:10 PM
Creation date
5/7/2003 7:48:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
11/26/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Further discussion: Councilmember Kurak stated that she thinks that there should be a solid <br />contract between the buyer and the seller before they proceed. City Attorney Goodrich noted <br />that the case should be tabled to a specific date so that the title issue can be resolved. <br />Councilmember Hendriksen stated that he did not think that they would approve the <br />configuration proposed without looking at the bigger picture. City Attorney Goodrich agreed, <br />stating that the Council would want to ensure that the plat in Case #6 would be approved. <br />Councilmember Kurak stated that she would like to see the developer bring forward a purchase <br />agreement that is solid. Mr. McGhee stated that he did not understand why they would table <br />action when the City typically passes 90 percent of the plats contingent upon good title. City <br />Attorney Goodrich replied that 90 percent of the time they don't have a landowner coming <br />forward saying that the developer does not have a valid purchase agreement. Councilmember <br />Hendriksen stated that the reason he personally thinks they should table action is that he can't <br />imagine approving this plat unless they were going to approve the plat in Case #6. <br /> <br />Motion was amended to table action until December 10, 2002. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Kurak, Hendriksen, Anderson, <br />and Zimmerman. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case #6: <br /> <br />Request for Final Plat Approval of Villas of Meadow Pointe Tonwhomes: <br />Case of Allstate Development, LLC <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Hendriksen, seconded by Councilmember Kurak, to table action on <br />final plat approval of Villas of Meadow Pointe Townhomes until December 10, 2002~ <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Hendriksen, Kurak, Anderson, <br />and Zimmerman. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen stated that he had thought they were supposed to have the <br />Rivenwick development on the agenda tonight. <br /> <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon replied that staff received a letter from the developer today waiving <br />the 60-day rule. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec recessed the regular meeting of the City Council at 8:30 p.m. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec called the regular meeting of the City Council back to order at 8:38 p.m: <br /> <br />Case#7: Status of Conditional Use Permit for Asphalt Mix Plant: Case of <br /> Commercial Asphalt <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik stated that at Citizen Input at City Council meetings on <br /> <br />City Council/November 26, 2002 <br /> Page 15 of 23 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.