My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/24/2018
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2018
>
Agenda - Council - 04/24/2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 2:50:45 PM
Creation date
4/19/2018 5:09:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/24/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
855
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
encouraged the City to find the number for franchise fees that would feel right, get some traction <br />in the program, and then review to determine if the fee needs to be adjusted. He provided a <br />suggested process for implementation of franchise fees, should the Council decide to go down <br />that path. He stated that he cannot think of any reason that the City shouldn't chose franchise <br />fees. He stated that there may be opposition in the beginning but once the program moves ahead <br />it will help the City to get control of the roads and people will like the program and support it. <br />Ms. Edison stated that homeowners are actually excited to see their road being repaired and <br />therefore construction moves much more smoothly. <br />Mr. Weiss stated that they provide flexibility to the contractor, stating that the project can be <br />completed between May and October but only within a 60-day window once they begin. <br />Mayor Strommen stated that the key argument she heard is the cost efficiency in the franchise <br />fee method and perhaps WSB staff could provide assistance if this moves forward. <br />Mr. Weiss noted that they have real world examples that they can provide for comparison. <br />Councilmember Riley stated that now that the City is a few years into this program, it is easy to <br />see what the debt is doing to the City's levy. He stated that it would be very powerful to show <br />the correlation and that the City's levy could be reduced if you remove the road financing. <br />Mayor Strommen agreed that perhaps the City did not make the financial argument very well in <br />the last discussion of franchise fees. She stated that it may be good to continue this discussion <br />with the budget in preparation for the 2019 budget discussions. <br />Councilmember LeTourneau stated that he would want to see a few scenarios that would show <br />the levy without road financing compared to the current levy that includes the road financing. <br />Finance Director Lund agreed that she could provide that comparison of the current levy and <br />what the levy would have been if the City would have gone with the franchise fee method. <br />Mayor Strommen noted that it would also be interesting to see the funding that would be <br />available if the City used a rate of $4 and $5 rather than simply using $8. She stated that perhaps <br />$8 was too high as a starting place. <br />Councilmember Riley stated that the decision would also need to be made to the people that have <br />been assessed, as the method would need to be fair. He noted that the hit might not be too bad as <br />many people chose to finance their assessment over a number of years. <br />Councilmember LeTourneau stated that it will be interesting to see the reply of the residents on <br />his topic through the resident survey, which may be an opportunity to open the discussion for <br />road financing. <br />City Council Work Session / March 27, 2018 <br />Page 4 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.