My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council Work Session - 03/13/2018
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council Work Session
>
2018
>
Minutes - Council Work Session - 03/13/2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 12:44:14 PM
Creation date
4/24/2018 10:30:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
03/13/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Kuzma stated that there was talk of televising the other Commissions and <br /> received confirmation that all meetings are now televised. <br /> City Administrator Ulrich noted that as discussed, he will add the preamble of the expectation for <br /> use of this policy, the additional notification period, amending the number of allowed users to <br /> one per meeting, reducing the number of allowed times of use to two per year for Boards and <br /> Commissions, adding language on decorum, and adding a statement that specifies that an <br /> individual would be responsible for the cost. He stated that he will also investigate the possible <br /> cost and bring this item back to the Council again in the future. <br /> 2.03: Review Construction Manager Option for Public Works Campus <br /> City Administrator Ulrich reviewed the staff report. <br /> Brian Recker, RJM Construction, provided background on his organization which has been in <br /> business for 21 years and focuses on healthcare, corporate clients, and municipalities. He <br /> provided information on how cities traditionally deliver a construction project utilizing the <br /> competitive bidding process. He stated that municipalities have struggled with that process <br /> because rather than bringing on a partner for the project, they are bringing on the lowest bidding <br /> contractor. He stated that construction management came into the metro market about 25 years <br /> ago and the process brings on a construction manager at the beginning of the project, often times <br /> before you hire an architect, and that manager becomes the advocate for the City throughout the <br /> process. He stated that the architect and construction manager will work together and as the <br /> architect designs the project, the construction manager continues to check in and ensure that the <br /> budget remains consistent. He stated that if the budget checks in above budget, the construction <br /> manager then provides input on cost savings or reduction ideas that could be implemented to <br /> bring the project back to the budget. He stated that the construction manager will look through <br /> all the plan documents to ensure that there are no gaps or grey areas that a bidder could leave out <br /> of their bid and come back to the City later with a change order. He stated that the construction <br /> manager will also review the materials to ensure that the best value will be gained for the City. <br /> He noted that the project will need to be publicly bid once the plans are prepared. He explained <br /> that the plans will be broken up into packages and each individual trade will bid on their <br /> applicable scope of work and the recommendation would be made to accept the low bidder for <br /> each individual plan package. He stated that the construction manager would also provide a job <br /> superintendent that oversees the activity from the contractors and would oversee the project <br /> throughout the entire process as an advocate for the City. He stated that there are two ways to <br /> provide construction manager services, through an agency construction manager or a <br /> construction manager at risk. He explained the differences noting that with an agency <br /> construction manager, the City would hold the contracts with the individual contractors. He <br /> stated that some cities had bad experiences with that method because the construction manager <br /> was not taking full responsibility on the job site and communicating with the contractors because <br /> the City is holding the contracts. He stated that because of that experience a new method was <br /> developed, construction manager at risk, in which the City still goes to bid for the plan packages <br /> and a recommendation is made to accept the low bidder for each plan package, but the contracts <br /> are then held through the construction management office rather than the City holding each <br /> contract. He provided an example where a contractor was working on a municipal job and went <br /> City Council Work Session/March 13, 2018 <br /> Page 4 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.