My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 02/08/2018
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
2018
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 02/08/2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 12:44:15 PM
Creation date
5/3/2018 10:40:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
02/08/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
218
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Projects continuing a phased high -priority project or one of relatively high priority that is timed <br />with other public improvement projects to achieve significant economies in cost of construction. <br />• A project providing a specific facility that meets a documented need, is currently not available, <br />or is significantly under -represented in the system where there will be no adverse effect on the <br />natural resource base. <br />• Regional trails that connect to other trails or regional facilities or extend existing trails. <br />• Natural resource restoration, invasive species control and other types of resource restoration <br />and protection projects. <br />• Acquisition of parkland parcels or reimbursement for parkland parcels. <br />• Matching non -state and non -Council funds to develop/rehabilitate recreation facilities or restore <br />natural resource areas is encouraged. <br />• Projects that provide essential facility improvements and natural resource enhancements to <br />allow for the initial public use of a regional park once there is adequate demand and acquisition <br />base to support the development. <br />Early efforts of the Regional Parks System program focused on acquiring desirable tracts of land and <br />incorporating existing park facilities that are valuable to the region. Since the lands in question were <br />being used, or were intended to be used, for some form of recreation, it was recognized that eventually <br />the new lands would require development and the facilities in the older parks would have to be <br />redeveloped through replacement or reconstruction. <br />Regional park implementing agencies are responsible for the development and rehabilitation needs for <br />their units in the Regional Parks System. Each regional park implementing agency ranks its proposed <br />development and rehabilitation projects for possible inclusion in the capital improvement program of the <br />Council. All of the proposed development and rehabilitation projects may be desirable, but some - due <br />to their location, their existing use or intended use - tend to be more valuable from a regional <br />standpoint than others. <br />Adding recreational facilities to Regional Parks System units must not adversely affect the natural <br />resource base that justifies the park or trail's regional designation. Regional park implementing <br />agencies need to balance the carrying capacity of the recreational facilities against the carrying <br />capacity of the park or trail corridor. <br />For regional trails, regional park implementing agencies are encouraged to connect existing trails to <br />other Regional Parks System units, most notably regional parks and park reserves. Regional park <br />implementing agencies are encouraged to negotiate with local communities and landowners to provide <br />fencing or vegetative screening to meet safety and local community concerns. Fencing and screening <br />along new or existing regional trails may be grant -eligible development costs. The Council and the <br />Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Commission will consider such costs when reviewing trail <br />development master plans and trail development funding requests. Excessive screening or fencing <br />beyond a reasonable minimum should be cost -shared with the adjacent landowner since the additional <br />cost provides no benefit to the trail -using public. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.