My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 02/08/2018
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
2018
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 02/08/2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 12:44:15 PM
Creation date
5/3/2018 10:40:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
02/08/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
218
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regional Park Study Areas <br />Typically, new regional parks are proposed as search areas that have been identified based on high - <br />quality natural resources located in portions of the region where population growth is expected. <br />However, there are times when a regional park implementing agency may want to propose including <br />existing parks into the Regional Park System. In an effort to make an informed decision, further study is <br />required to assess whether the proposed addition is of regional significance. The proposed area for <br />consideration is called a Regional Park Study Area. Designation as a Regional Park Study Area does <br />not guarantee that a park will become part of the Regional Parks System. It acknowledges that studies <br />would need to be conducted to determine whether the facility warrants regional status. Once these <br />studies are complete, the information would be presented to the Metropolitan Parks and Open Space <br />Commission and the Council for evaluation. The Council's 2008 Regional Parks and Trails Survey <br />shows that at least 40% of visits to most regional parks are made by people who do not live in the <br />jurisdiction of the respective regional park implementing agency where the park is located. Therefore, <br />the benchmark applied for qualifying as a regional distribution of visitation is 40% non -local visits in <br />evaluating a regional park study area. <br />Deletion of a Proposed Regional Park Study Area <br />The 2030 Regional Parks Policy Plan included a regional park study area in northern Dakota County. <br />Dakota County proposed evaluating the feasibility of combining Thompson County Park in West St. <br />Paul with Kaposia Park and Kaposia Landing, two local parks in South St. Paul, into one regional park <br />unit. Council staff worked with Dakota County to conduct visitor origin surveys at these parks in 2012. <br />The results of the study determined that 16.7 percent of visits were non -local and that the Thompson <br />Kaposia Study Area did not meet the regional visitation distribution criteria. The Thompson-Kaposia <br />Regional Park Study Area has been removed from the System Plan Map as part of the 2040 Regional <br />Parks Policy Plan. <br />2040 Regional Parks System Plan Summary <br />As Figure 3-11 illustrates, the 2040 System Plan includes: <br />• Existing Regional Parks System facilities (2014) <br />42 regional parks <br />12 park reserves <br />8 special recreation features <br />40 regional trails, consisting of 340 miles <br />• Planned Regional Parks System facilities that are not yet open to the public <br />4 regional parks <br />1 park reserve <br />12 regional trails, consisting of 147 miles <br />• Regional Parks System Boundary Adjustments <br />2 regional parks <br />1 park reserve <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.