My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 05/03/2018
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2018
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 05/03/2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:30:54 AM
Creation date
5/3/2018 10:58:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
05/03/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
685
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Zoning Bulletin March 25, 2018 I Volume 12 I Issue 6 <br />MICHIGAN (01/18/18)—This case addressed the issue of whether <br />the Michigan Medical Marihuana Act (MCL §§ 333.26421 to <br />333.26430) permitted outdoor medical marijuana growing, and, if so, <br />whether it preempted a township's zoning regulation prohibiting out- <br />door growing in residential areas. <br />The Background/Facts: David Miller and Donald Miller resided at <br />Donald's home in a residential zoning district in York Township (the <br />"Township"). Both were qualified medical marijuana patients under <br />Michigan law. Katherine Null ("Null") had formerly been in a long- <br />term 'relationship with David. Null was David's registered medical <br />marijuana primary caregiver under Michigan law. In 2014, at Null's <br />direction, David constructed a medical marijuana structure in Donald's <br />backyard "for containing the cultivation of medical marijuana" for <br />patients connected to Null through registration under the Michigan <br />Medical Marihuana Act ("MMMA"), MCL §§ 333.26421 to <br />333.26430. <br />At some point, the Township learned that the Millers and Null (col- <br />lectively, the "Defendants") had built their medical marijuana facility <br />outdoors, and that the Defendants had failed to comply with Township <br />zoning and construction regulations in doing so. In the Township, medi- <br />cal marijuana caregivers were required to comply with the Township's <br />Zoning Ordinance § 40.204, which restricted home occupations and <br />home -based businesses. Zoning Ordinance § 40.204 permitted medical <br />marijuana caregivers to operate as a "home occupation" if they <br />complied with the MMMA and certain specified 'restrictions. Among <br />other things, § 40.204 required that all medical marijuana be contained <br />inside the house in residential zoned areas, and prohibited medical <br />marijuana caregivers from having or growing any medical marijuana <br />outside the house on properties zoned residential. The ordinance also <br />required permits for modification of any portion of the house for <br />cultivation, growing, or harvesting of marijuana. <br />The Defendants failed to comply with the Township's Zoning <br />Ordinance § 40.204 because they grew medical marijuana outside and <br />not entirely within Donald's house. The Defendants also failed to obtain <br />a construction permit for the medical marijuana outdoor growing facil- <br />ity, and failed to get permits before installing related electrical and <br />watering systems. <br />Instead of enforcing the Zoning Ordinance regulations against the <br />Defendants, the Township filed a declaratory judgment action. The <br />Township asked the trial court to determine the validity of its zoning <br />regulations as applied "to the cultivation and use of medical marijuana <br />in zoned residential locations and subdivisions." Specifically, the court <br />was asked to determine whether the MMMA permitted outdoor medi- <br />cal marijuana growing, and, if so, whether the MMMA preempted the <br />© 2018 Thomson Reuters 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.