My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 05/03/2018
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2018
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 05/03/2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:30:54 AM
Creation date
5/3/2018 10:58:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
05/03/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
685
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Zoning Bulletin March 25, 2018 I Volume 12 I Issue 6 <br />the appellate court concluded that, "[f]or the same reasons that federal <br />law does not expressly preempt the [C]ity from enforcing its zoning <br />and property maintenance codes within Rambush Estates, the MHBC <br />does not expressly preempt the [C]ity's zoning and property mainte- <br />nance codes from being enforced within Rambush Estates." Moreover, <br />the appellate court found that a provision in the code -compliance sec- <br />tion of the MHBC expressly authorized local code enforcement that is <br />outside the context of construction and safety. Specifically, that provi- <br />sion provides: "Nothing in this section shall be construed to inhibit the <br />application of zoning, subdivision, architectural, or [a]esthetic require- <br />ments . . . ." )(See Minn. Stat. § 327.32, subd. 5.) <br />The appellate court further found that, contrary to the district court's <br />holding, Minnesota statutes did not field preempt the City's zoning <br />code enforcement in manufactured home parks. Rather, noted the ap- <br />pellate court, Minnesota statutes explicitly protect city authority within <br />manufactured home parks: Minn. Stat. § 327.32, subd. 5, specifies that <br />a city is permitted to apply "zoning, subdivision, architectural, or [a]es- <br />thetic requirements" within a manufactured home park, and Minn. Stat. <br />§ 327.26, subd. 2 (2016), explicitly permits cities to enforce ordinances <br />relating to the safety and protection of people within a manufactured <br />home park. Thus, the court concluded that since state law explicitly <br />authorizes municipalities to regulate within manufactured home parks, <br />state law has not fully occupied the field of manufactured -home -park <br />regulation, and the district court erred in holding the contrary and <br />concluding that the City could not enforce its zoning and property <br />maintenance codes within Rambush Estates. <br />Case Note: <br />Eich had also brought as -applied due -process claims. However, the court <br />found that those claims were "moot with respect to injunctive relief." <br />Zoning News from Around the <br />Nation <br />CALIFORNIA <br />In an effort to meet the "current housing crisis," California State <br />Senator Scott Wiener has introduced the Transit Zoning Bill, SB 827. <br />The bill "would allow new housing near major transit hubs to be built <br />up to eight stories tall, overriding local zoning restrictions." The bill <br />would "set statewide standards for height, density and eliminate any <br />© 2018 Thomson Reuters 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.