My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 05/03/2018
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2018
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 05/03/2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:30:54 AM
Creation date
5/3/2018 10:58:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
05/03/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
685
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FACADE <br />FENESTRATION <br />Max 70%Min 25% <br />per STORY <br />BALCONIES <br />Permitted <br />Max 7ft <br />Deep <br />FROM PORCH <br />or STOOP <br />RBL <br />Parking Setback <br />; Line <br />STOOP <br />Max 6ft Width <br />Max 5ft <br />Depth <br />PRIVACY FENCE <br />Height 5 ft to 8ft <br />permitted <br />ELEMENTS <br />FRONT PORCH Spec <br />Min 65% of Ralwidth <br />Min 7ft <br />Max 9ft <br />Depth <br />Servicing shall be <br />to the rear, off the <br />ALLEY if present <br />Residential <br />0 <br />Parking Setback Line <br />ATTIC STORY <br />USE <br />Servicing shall be <br />to the rear, off the <br />ALLEY. <br />Residential <br />Accessory Unit <br />Workshop <br />Parking <br />Q In 2013, Arlington County, Virginia, adopted the Columbia Pike Neighborhoods Form Based Code to facilitate the preservation <br />of 6,20o affordable housing units. <br />apply to a project, including the applicable <br />procedures and standards. A more extensive <br />explanation, with illustrations and other <br />helpful aids, can be provided in an admin- <br />istrative manual. In abbreviated form, the <br />code and the changes it incorporates can be <br />explained also in a "frequently asked ques- <br />tions" document available at the planning <br />counter, the communitywebsite, or other pub- <br />lic areas. Examples of a range of approaches <br />to form -based code user guides are available <br />online. Some approaches to providing users <br />with a guide to the regulations: <br />• South Padre Island, Texas, Padre Boule- <br />vard and Entertainment District: The guide <br />takes applicants on a step-by-step walk <br />through the code to determine applicable <br />regulations, along with illustrations and <br />sample calculations. <br />o Chapel Hill, North Carolina, Form - <br />Based Code Guide: This guide offers a <br />detailed preadoption community guide <br />to form -based code basics, regional <br />use, anticipated outcomes, and how <br />form -based regulations could work in a <br />specific area. <br />• Miami, Miami21: The code preamble <br />describes step-by-step instructions for <br />how to navigate the various sections <br />of the code, and the city's webpage <br />provides an abbreviated description <br />(miami2l.org/zoning_usingthecode.asp). <br />• Nashville, Tennessee, Downtown Code: <br />A "how-to" guide is included in the code <br />introduction. It provides basic instruc- <br />tions for using the regulations as well <br />as an overview of procedural options for <br />modifications to standards. <br />• Boulder, Colorado, Form -Based Code: <br />Instructions for the user are built in to <br />the individual sections of the Boulder <br />Junction Phase 1 Code Area, providing <br />users with both graphics of design ele- <br />ments as well as maps of where specific <br />element types should be included in the <br />site design. <br />Finally, a critical area of discus- <br />sion needs to be around the selection of <br />administrative procedures. This will be <br />most relevant for communities that stick <br />to the basic review processes of rezoning <br />and subdivision approval with the random <br />conditional use approval thrown in forvari- <br />ety. Form -based regulations require site <br />plan review and, at a minimum, a method <br />to modify design standards to meet site <br />conditions. This is a different procedure <br />than a variance; and, as we noted above, a <br />variance is a specific procedure with legal <br />requirements that should not be "adjusted" <br />to change the form -based regulations. <br />Many communities opt for at least <br />two types of design modification: one <br />that allows the administrative approval <br />of changes to measurable regulations up <br />to a specific percent of modification and <br />one that creates a higher level of review — <br />typically discretionary —for either a greater <br />percentage of change or change to a more <br />subjective regulation. For example, an <br />administrative modification may be permit- <br />ted for a change of io percent or less to a <br />parking lot setback where the topography <br />of the lot makes it a better choice to locate <br />a space in the setback rather than perched <br />over a steep grade. In the same code, there <br />may be a provision that allows planning <br />commission or elected official review and <br />approval of a landscape plan that reduces <br />the required private open space on a tot and <br />replaces it with a public art installation. <br />Another subject for form -based -specific <br />procedures is creation of, and amendment <br />to, regulating plans. Old -school form - <br />based codes came with the regulating <br />plan built in, but these days we are also <br />observing more options to create a regulat- <br />ing plan after the fact. As an example, see <br />Cincinnati's Form -Based Code (http://bit. <br />ly/2Gpinoc), which includes instructions <br />for creating a regulating plan as part of the <br />code. We would be remiss in our duty as <br />attorneys to not tell you here that much of <br />what is permitted in administrative proce- <br />dures is regulated by state law, and your <br />jurisdiction's attorney should review pro- <br />posed procedures prior to adoption. <br />ZONINGPRACTICE 4.n8 <br />AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION I page 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.